Purpose This work sought to compare a quantitative T1 bookend dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI based perfusion protocol for absolute cerebral blood flow (qCBF) against CBF measured by the stable‐isotope neutron capture microsphere method, a recognized reference standard for measuring tissue blood flow, at normocapnia, hypercapnia, and in acute stroke. Methods CBF was measured in anesthetized female canines by MRI and microspheres over 2 consecutive days for each case. On day 1, 5 canines were measured before and during a physiological challenge induced by carbogen inhalation; on day 2, 4 canines were measured following permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measured by MRI and microsphere deposition were compared. Results MRI correlated strongly with microspheres at the hemispheric level for CBF during normo‐ and hypercapnic states (r2 = 0.96), for individual cerebrovascular reactivity (r2 = 0.84), and for postocclusion CBF (r2 = 0.82). Correction for the delay and dispersion of the contrast bolus resulted in a significant improvement in the correlation between MRI and microsphere deposition in the ischemic state (r2 = 0.96). In all comparisons, moderate correlations were found at the regional level. Conclusion In an experimental canine model with and without permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, MRI‐based qCBF yielded moderate to strong correlations for absolute quantitative CBF and cerebrovascular reactivity measurements during normocapnia and hypercapnia. Correction for delay and dispersion greatly improved the quantitation during occlusion of the middle cerebral artery, underscoring the importance for this correction under focal ischemic condition.
BackgroundThis study sought to test the hypothesis that simultaneous central blood pressure elevation and potent vasodilation can mitigate pial collateral-dependent infarct growth in acute ischemic stroke.MethodsTwenty mongrel canines (20–30 kg) underwent permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Eight subjects received continuous infusion of norepinephrine (0.1–1.5200 µg/kg/min; titrated to a median of 34 mmHg above baseline mean arterial pressure) and hydralazine (20 mg) starting 30 min following MCAO. Pial collateral recruitment was scored prior to treatment and used to predict infarct volume based on a previously reported parameterization. Serial diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions tracked infarct volumes over a 4-hour time frame. Infarct volumes and infarct volume growth between treatment and control groups were compared with each other and to predicted values. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and necropsy findings were included in the evaluation.ResultsDifferences between treatment and control group varied by pial collateral recruitment based on indicator-variable regression effects analysis with interaction confirmed by regression model fit. Benefit in treatment group was only in subjects with poor collaterals which had 35.7% less infarct volume growth (P=0.0008; ANOVA) relative to controls. Measured infarct growth was significantly lower than predicted by the model (linear regression partial F-test, slope P<0.001, intercept=0.003). There was no evidence for cerebral hemorrhage or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.ConclusionOur results indicate that a combination of norepinephrine and hydralazine administered in the acute phase of ischemic stroke mitigates infarct evolution in subjects with poor but not good collateral recruitment.
BackgroundThis study tests the hypothesis that simultaneous cerebral blood pressure elevation and potent vasodilation augments perfusion to ischemic tissue in acute ischemic stroke and it varies by degree of pial collateral recruitment.MethodsFifteen mongrel canines were included. Subjects underwent permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion; pial collateral recruitment was scored before treatment. Seven treatment subjects received a continuous infusion of norepinephrine (0.1–1.52 µg/kg/min; titrated 25–45 mmHg above baseline mean arterial pressure while keeping systolic blood pressure below 180 mmHg) and hydralazine (20 mg) starting 30 min post-occlusion. Perfusion (cerebral blood flow—CBF) was evaluated with quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI 2.5 hours post-occlusion to produce images in mL/100 g/min, and relative CBF measured as ratios. Mean region of interest (ROI) values were reported, and compared and subject to regression analysis to elucidate trends.ResultsDifferences in quantitative CBF (qCBF) between treatment and control group varied by degree of pial collateral recruitment, based on Wilcoxon rank sum scores and regression model fit. For poorly collateralized subjects, ipsilateral anatomic, core infarct, and penumbra regions showed treatment with higher qCBF, raised above the ischemic threshold, compared with the control, while well collateralized subjects showed a paradoxical decrease maintained above the ischemic threshold for neuronal death. qCBF on the contralateral side increased regardless of collateralization.ConclusionResults suggest that perfusion can be augmented in ischemic stroke with norepinephrine and hydralazine. Perfusion augmentation depends on degree of collateralization and territory in question, with some evidence of vascular steal.
Background Pial arterioles can provide a variable degree of collateral flow to ischemic vascular territories during acute ischemic stroke. This study sought to identify predictive factors of the degree of pial collateral recruitment in acute ischemic stroke. Methods Clinical information and arteriograms from 62 consecutive patients with stroke due to either middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segment or internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus occlusion within 6 h following symptom onset were retrospectively reviewed. Pial collaterals were defined based on the extent of reconstitution of the MCA territory. Patients with slow antegrade flow distal to the occlusion site were excluded and no anesthetics were used prior or during angiography. Results were analyzed using multivariate nominal logistic regression. Results Better pial collateral recruitment was associated with proximal MCA versus ICA terminus occlusion ( p = 0.005; odds ratio (OR) = 9.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.16–53.3), lower presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSSS) ( p = 0.023; OR = 6.51; 95% CI, 1.49–41.7), and lower diastolic blood pressure ( p = 0.0411; OR = 5.05; 95% CI, 1.20–29.2). Age, gender, symptom duration, diabetes, laterality, systolic blood pressure, glucose level, hematocrit, platelet level, and white blood cell count at presentation were not found to have a statistically significant association with pial collateral recruitment. Conclusions Extent of pial collateral recruitment is strongly associated with the occlusion site (MCA M1 segment versus ICA terminus) and less strongly associated with presenting NIHSSS and diastolic blood pressure.
Lower lumbar paraspinal muscles constitute a compartment as they are surrounded by distinct fascial and bony boundaries. Lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome is a rare entity, often caused by intense exercise, but also can be a postoperative complication. We present a 60-year-old man with low back pain, numbness in the left lower back and radicular pain in the left lower extremity, which started after a surgery that involved prolonged positioning on the left side 7 years before, and persisted to the day of evaluation. There was an immediate transient rise in the creatine kinase after surgery. Electromyography showed a left lower lumbar–sacral plexopathy and a lumbar spine MRI revealed fatty infiltration of the lower lumbar–sacral paraspinal muscles. The emergence of radicular lower limb pain was likely due to the compression of the proximal portion of lumbar–sacral plexus during the acute stage of rhabdomyolysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.