ObjectivesMesenchymal stem cells have the ability to differentiate into various cell types, and thus have emerged as promising alternatives to chondrocytes in cell-based cartilage repair methods. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with platelet rich fibrin on osteochondral defect repair and articular cartilage regeneration in a canine model.MethodsOsteochondral defects were created on the medial femoral condyles of 12 adult male mixed breed dogs. They were either treated with stem cells seeded on platelet rich fibrin or left empty. Macroscopic and histological evaluation of the repair tissue was conducted after four, 16 and 24 weeks using the International Cartilage Repair Society macroscopic and the O’Driscoll histological grading systems. Results were reported as mean and standard deviation (sd) and compared at different time points between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, with a value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.ResultsHigher cumulative macroscopic and histological scores were observed in stem cell treated defects throughout the study period with significant differences noted at four and 24 weeks (9.25, sd 0.5 vs 7.25, sd 0.95, and 10, sd 0.81 vs 7.5, sd 0.57; p < 0.05) and 16 weeks (16.5, sd 4.04 vs 11, sd 1.15; p < 0.05), respectively. Superior gross and histological characteristics were also observed in stem cell treated defects.ConclusionThe use of autologous culture expanded bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells on platelet rich fibrin is a novel method for articular cartilage regeneration. It is postulated that platelet rich fibrin creates a suitable environment for proliferation and differentiation of stem cells by releasing endogenous growth factors resulting in creation of a hyaline-like reparative tissue.Cite this article: D. Kazemi, K. Shams Asenjan, N. Dehdilani, H. Parsa. Canine articular cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells seeded on platelet rich fibrin: Macroscopic and histological assessments. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:98–107. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.62.BJR-2016-0188.R1.
The ability and efficiency of targeted nucleases to perform sequence replacements or insertions into the genome are limited. This limited efficiency for sequence replacements or insertions can be explained by the dependency on DNA repair pathways, the possibility of cellular toxicity, and unwanted activation of proto-oncogenes. The piggyBac (PB) transposase uses a very efficient enzymatic mechanism to integrate DNA fragments into the genome in a random manner. In this study, we fused an RNA-guided catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) to the PB transposase and used dual sgRNAs to localize this molecule to specific genomic targets. We designed and used a promoter/reporter complementation assay to register and recover cells harboringspecific integrations, where only by complementation upon correct genomic integration, the reporter can be activated. Using an RNA-guided piggyBac transposase and dual sgRNAs, we were able to achieve site-directed integrations in the human ROSA26 safe harbor region in 0.32% of cells. These findings show that the methodology used in this study can be used for targeting genomic regions. An application for this finding could be in cancer cells to insert sequences into specific target regions that are intended to be destroyed, or to place promoter cargos behind the tumor suppressor genes to activate them. K E Y W O R D SCRISPR-associated protein 9, gene insertion, Insertional mutagenesis, piggyBac transposase, transposases 2 of | GOSHAYESHI Et Al.
Generating biopharmaceuticals in genetically engineered bioreactors continues to reign supreme. Hence, genetically engineered birds have attracted considerable attention from the biopharmaceutical industry. Fairly recent genome engineering methods have made genome manipulation an easy and affordable task. In this review, we first provide a broad overview of the approaches and main impediments ahead of generating efficient and reliable genetically engineered birds, and various factors that affect the fate of a transgene. This section provides an essential background for the rest of the review, in which we discuss and compare different genome manipulation methods in the pre-CRISPR and CRISPR era in the field of avian genome engineering.
Background One of the most prominent questions in the field of transgenesis is ‘Where in the genome to integrate a transgene?’. Escape from epigenetic silencing and promoter shutdown of the transgene needs reliable genomic safe harbor (GSH) loci. Advances in genome engineering technologies combined with multi-omics bioinformatics data have enabled rational evaluation of GSH loci in the host genome. Currently, no validated GSH loci have been evaluated in the chicken genome. Results Here, we analyzed and experimentally examined two GSH loci in the genome of chicken cells. To this end, putative GSH loci including chicken HIPP-like (cHIPP; between DRG1 and EIF4ENIF1 genes) and chicken ROSA-like (cROSA; upstream of the THUMPD3 gene) were predicted using multi-omics bioinformatics data. Then, the durable expression of the transgene was validated by experimental characterization of continuously-cultured isogenous cell clones harboring DsRed2-ΔCMV-EGFP cassette in the predicted loci. The weakened form of the CMV promoter (ΔCMV) allowed the precise evaluation of GSH loci in a locus-dependent manner compared to the full-length CMV promoter. Conclusions cHIPP and cROSA loci introduced in this study can be reliably exploited for consistent bio-manufacturing of recombinant proteins in the genetically-engineered chickens. Also, results showed that the genomic context dictates the expression of transgene controlled by ΔCMV in GSH loci.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.