The photosynthetic electron transport chain (PETC) provides energy and redox equivalents for carbon fixation by the Calvin‐Benson‐Bassham (CBB) cycle. Both of these processes have been thoroughly investigated and the underlying molecular mechanisms are well known. However, it is far from understood by which mechanisms it is ensured that energy and redox supply by photosynthesis matches the demand of the downstream processes. Here, we deliver a theoretical analysis to quantitatively study the supply–demand regulation in photosynthesis. For this, we connect two previously developed models, one describing the PETC, originally developed to study non‐photochemical quenching, and one providing a dynamic description of the photosynthetic carbon fixation in C3 plants, the CBB Cycle. The merged model explains how a tight regulation of supply and demand reactions leads to efficient carbon fixation. The model further illustrates that a stand‐by mode is necessary in the dark to ensure that the carbon fixation cycle can be restarted after dark–light transitions, and it supports hypotheses, which reactions are responsible to generate such mode in vivo.

Gene structural annotation is a critical step in obtaining biological knowledge from genome sequences yet remains a major challenge in genomics projects. Current de novo Hidden Markov Models are limited in their capacity to model biological complexity; while current pipelines are resource-intensive and their results vary in quality with the available extrinsic data. Here, we build on our previous work in applying Deep Learning to gene calling to make a fully applicable, fast and user friendly tool for predicting primary gene models from DNA sequence alone. The quality is state-of-the-art, with predictions scoring closer by most measures to the references than to predictions from other de novo tools. Helixer's predictions can be used as is or could be integrated in pipelines to boost quality further. Moreover, there is substantial potential for further improvements and advancements in gene calling with Deep Learning. Helixer is open source and available at https://github.com/weberlab-hhu/Helixer A web interface is available at https://www.plabipd.de/helixer_main.html

Understanding microbial growth with the use of mathematical models has a long history that dates back to the pioneering work of Jacques Monod in the 1940s. Monod’s famous growth law expressed microbial growth rate as a simple function of the limiting nutrient concentration. However, to explain growth laws from underlying principles is extremely challenging. In the second half of the 20th century, numerous experimental approaches aimed at precisely measuring heat production during microbial growth to determine the entropy balance in a growing cell and to quantify the exported entropy. This has led to the development of thermodynamic theories of microbial growth, which have generated fundamental understanding and identified the principal limitations of the growth process. Although these approaches ignored metabolic details and instead considered microbial metabolism as a black box, modern theories heavily rely on genomic resources to describe and model metabolism in great detail to explain microbial growth. Interestingly, however, thermodynamic constraints are often included in modern modeling approaches only in a rather superficial fashion, and it appears that recent modeling approaches and classical theories are rather disconnected fields. To stimulate a closer interaction between these fields, we here review various theoretical approaches that aim at describing microbial growth based on thermodynamics and outline the resulting thermodynamic limits and optimality principles. We start with classical black box models of cellular growth, and continue with recent metabolic modeling approaches that include thermodynamics, before we place these models in the context of fundamental considerations based on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. We conclude by identifying conceptual overlaps between the fields and suggest how the various types of theories and models can be integrated. We outline how concepts from one approach may help to inform or constrain another, and we demonstrate how genome-scale models can be used to infer key black box parameters, such as the energy of formation or the degree of reduction of biomass. Such integration will allow understanding to what extent microbes can be viewed as thermodynamic machines, and how close they operate to theoretical optima.

The modelbase package is a free expandable Python package for building and analysing dynamic mathematical models of biological systems. Originally it was designed for the simulation of metabolic systems, but it can be used for virtually any deterministic chemical processes. modelbase provides easy construction methods to define reactions and their rates. Based on the rates and stoichiometries, the system of differential equations is assembled automatically. modelbase minimises the constraints imposed on the user, allowing for easy and dynamic access to all variables, including derived ones, in a convenient manner. A simple incorporation of algebraic equations is, for example, convenient to study systems with rapid equilibrium or quasi steady-state approximations. Moreover, modelbase provides construction methods that automatically build all isotope-specific versions of a particular reaction, making it a convenient tool to analyse non-steady state isotope-labelling experiments.