The mechanisms of formation of chromosomal aberrations are poorly understood, despite the common use of aberrations as a measure of the genetic effects of physical and chemical agents. We have used restriction endonucleases to introduce defined DNA double-strand breaks into mammalian cells, and measured chromosomal aberration formation relative to the activity of the endonuclease. The endonucleases AluI and Sau3AI remain active for a relatively short time under simulated cellular conditions and induce achromatic lesions ('gaps') in chromatids only within the first hour or two following treatment. In contrast, the endonuclease MboI (an isoschizomer of Sau3AI) is active for an extremely long time and continues to produce chromatid gaps during the whole 12 hr sampling period. This observation strongly suggests that the aberrations classified as gaps are a manifestation of unrejoined DNA double-strand breaks. The formation of gaps may relate to the opportunities for repair of DNA breaks in relation to cell-cycle position. It is more difficult to relate the formation of structural chromatid aberrations to the endonuclease activity, although at relatively low concentrations all 3 endonucleases gave similar levels of structural aberrations.
The use of restriction endonucleases (RE) to study the importance of DNA break end structures in differential cellular response has proved controversial. The number of DNA cut sites and the accessibility of RE are recognized examples of confounding factors. We have eliminated these factors by comparing the effectiveness of isoschizomers. Additionally, we considered for the first time the tolerance of the enzymes to cellular conditions. Cell killing and mutation were compared to the overall cutting ability of the enzymes in an "intracellular" buffer. We found that the activity of each RE combined with its lifetime, under simulated cellular conditions, were the overriding factors in determining effectiveness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.