No abstract

The contribution of State-Owned Plantation Enterprises (SOPE) of has a strategic role as one of the economic institutions in Indonesia. This study discusses the importance of the transparency principle in the management of SOPE to anticipate various frauds. One of the factors that cause the SOPE inefficient is the company's management weakness. The principles of good corporate governance in the Republic of Indonesia Act No.19 / 2003 about State-Owned Company (SOC) stated that the SOC have obligations to implement the principles of professionalism, efficiency, transparency, independence, accountability, responsibility, and fairness. The research method is normative juridical and the study found there are violations of the transparency principle in the SOPE management. It can cause economic losses for the company, investors, and the state. In conclusion, violations of the transparency principle such as false and misleading statements that are not in accordance with facts are acts of fraud. The importance of application the principle of transparency in the SOPE management is to anticipate the various frauds intended. Therefore, the implementation of the transparency principle in the SOPE management must be implemented with a strict supervision system through due diligence. All fraudulent practices in SOPE must also be legally accounted for, without exception, because it can harm the company, investors, the state, and stakeholders.

Air pollution badly affects the human rights to get a clean and healthy environment. This study aims atfinding out the legal certainty for the accuracy of measuring the quality standard level of air pollution. Thisstudy used a normative legal approach as the research method and the data were collected using a literature review. The results indicate that the level of standard criteria for air pollution is regulated in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 41 of 1999 concerning Air Pollution Control. The accuracy of standard criteria measurement can be guaranteed through the application of Law Number 2 of 1981 concerning Legal Metrology. Furthermore, the obligation of calibration and re-calibration against measuring, dosing, weighing devices and their outfits further guarantees the legal certainty for the society. In conclusion, it was found that by using a precise and accurate measurement method and tool, widespread impacts of environmental damage caused by air pollution can be anticipated. Therefore, the government should always follow technological developments, especially in the field of air pollution measurement.

The purport of this article is to examine the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1/2020 enacted by Indonesian Government to controlling the spread of COVID-19 was meant to protect people's life or economy. National Commission of Human Rights in Indonesia (KOMNAS HAM) publish its report on governance of controlling COVID-19 in Human Rights' perspective, proclaimed Government put excessive effort to stabilize the economy. Therefore, research on the policy enacted by Indonesian Government to controlling COVID-19's transmission presumed on Article 3 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as an indicatory parameter for verifying the human rights value is necessary. The goal in this paper is to attain the view that Human Rights and Economy, respectively and directly, have the same important role in handling COVID-19 and have to be worked in parallel. in the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1/2020.

Abstract-Indonesian Law Number 23 on Local Government provides an authority to the local goverment to establish a LocalOwned Enterprise which is well known as BUMD (Badan Usaha Milik Daerah). BUMD has strategic roles in the autonomy era for providing benefitfor the economic growth, conducting general benefit and raising profit. However, it is difficult to achieve the goals of BUMD since the absence of laws on BUMD.There are two impacts of the absence of the law namely the ambiguity of managing BUMD both promoting public profit and achieving the breach of good corporate governance principle.This study uses stakeholder theory of modern corporation as the grand theory, fiduciary theory of corporation as middle range theory and legislation theory as applied theory.The result shows that firstly, Indonesia needs to have a special regulation concerning BUMD. Nowadays, although there are some regulations mentioning about BUMD both in national and local levels, it does not specifically discuss BUMD. Secondly, it is a must to have a fitted management in order to achieve the Goal of Establishment of BUMD either using stakeholder or stakeholder prinsciples.