A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'in which patients with a post-infarct ventricular septal rupture (PIVSR) might immediate surgery give better results than delayed surgery in terms of mortality'? Altogether, 88 papers were found using the reported search criteria, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The recommendations are based on outcomes from 3238 patients undergoing surgery for PIVSR. Mean age was 67.5 ± 8.8 (40-88 years). Left ventricular function was compromised in most patients with mean ejection fraction of 40%. All papers carried out univariate and/or multivariate analyses of variables that contributed to different in-hospital mortalities. Early surgery, i.e. from >3 days to within 4 weeks after MI, had an overall in-hospital mortality of 52.4%; delayed surgery, typically from 1 week to after 4 weeks post-myocardial infarction, had an overall operative in-hospital mortality of 7.56%. Most authors observe that a shorter time between rupture and surgery is an unfavourable predictor of outcome independent of haemodynamic status. The consensus was that nearly all patients with PIVSR, particularly if >15 mm diameter with a significant shunt and resultant haemodynamic deterioration, should undergo early surgical repair. The precise timing of surgery depends on patients' haemodynamic status. Exclusion from surgery should be considered if life expectancy or quality is severely limited by another limiting underlying pathology. If the patient is in cardiogenic shock, due to pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio shunt rather than infarct size, immediate surgery should follow resuscitation measures and cardiac support. If the patient is haemodynamically stable, surgery could be performed after 3-4 weeks of medical optimization with inotropic and mechanical cardiac support. If there is clinical deterioration, immediate surgery is indicated.
We report successful surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection in a Jehovah's Witness without the use of any blood products. An interposition graft replacement of the ascending aorta was carried out. This was under right axillo-atrial cardiopulmonary bypass with antegrade cerebral perfusion via right a subclavian and left carotid cannula for 24 minutes at 28°C. Body temperature was kept at 32°C throughout. Autologous transfusion was deployed using cell salvage and a preoperative haemodilution technique. The patient was given tranexamic acid, desmopressin, recombinant factor VIIa, folic acid and epoetin alfa. Patients who object to transfusion represent a significant challenge, especially those who are at a high risk of coagulopathy associated with inherent aortic dissection leading to perturbed haemodynamics, cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Type A aortic dissection repair is possible in patients refusing the use of blood products with blood salvage techniques and synthetic products that can limit the risk of bleeding. Minimal hypothermia is vital to preserve platelet function and avoid coagulopathy. Thus, a combination of normothermic/minimal hypothermia and antegrade cerebral protection with a blood conservation strategy can be deployed for a successful surgical outcome in aortic dissection without transfusion.
A 78-year-old man with combined trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgia underwent glycerol rhizolysis of the trigeminal ganglion. The treatment led to the immediate relief of both neuralgias. We discuss the potential mechanism of this unexpected therapeutic effect with reference to the pathophysiology of trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.