Background Healthcare workers play a vital role in vaccine promotion and acceptance through community dialogue, education, and myth-busting. Vaccinated healthcare workers will likely recommend the vaccine to their families and community. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with healthcare workers (n=357) to understand their knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and acceptance of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. The study was conducted in two blocks (Haveli and Velhe) of Pune, Maharashtra. Results The findings showed that over 90% of healthcare workers knew about COVID-19 vaccination and had a positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. Among them, vaccine uptake was high (93% with two doses and 4% with a single dose). 98% of healthcare workers believed that vaccine is safe to use. However, few gaps existed around vaccine safety, side effects and allergic reactions, as 27.7% believed that the COVID-19 vaccine could increase the risk of allergic reactions, 51.8% believed that acquiring natural immunity by contacting the virus is better than vaccination, 16.5% believed that it is possible to reduce the incidence of COVID-19 without vaccination, 28.9% believed that vaccine might have side effects and 14% believed vaccine is not the most likely way to control the pandemic. Conclusions Addressing the existing gaps and reinforcing the relevance of the COVID-19 vaccine through a structured program is critical to empower health workers to disseminate accurate information to the community, consecutively improve vaccination uptake, and boost vaccination efforts in India.

Background In the wake of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the development of the COVID-19 vaccine became a game-changing tool. However, the rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine gave rise to various myths, misconceptions and hesitancies among people. Methods A community-based household survey was conducted by the trained healthcare workers, i.e., Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) and Anganwadi Worker (AWW) in their respective villages. Information on socio-demographic profile, vaccination status and reasons for vaccine hesitancy in community members was collected during the survey. Details of the vaccination status of community members were cross-examined with government vaccination data. After survey administration, continuous sensitisation to every individual was carried out by trained healthcare workers making people aware and motivating them to vaccinate. Healthcare workers constantly followed up on individuals showcasing hesitancy, thereby building up vaccine confidence in them. Results Out of the total study population (N=12,812), 90.1% were found eligible for COVID-19 vaccination (>18 years), 57.8% individuals had received both doses of COVID-19 vaccine, and 23.2% had received only the first dose (partially vaccinated), whereas 9.1% were unvaccinated. The most reported vaccine hesitancy response was being worried about vaccine side effects at 9.2%. The other set of reasons reported among aged 60 years and above were being old (1.6%) and having a co-morbid condition (1.1%). Having an underlying illness was also reported in both age groups (45-60 years, and 60 years and older). Additionally, 18.2% of the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated eligible individuals reported planning to get vaccinated soon. Conclusions The study reported many myths and misconceptions, and hesitancies related to the COVID-19 vaccine among the community members being a major lag in the vaccine acceptance and uptake. Therefore, adequate vaccine education is much needed to engage the non-medical group, as they mostly tend to have positive interactions with the community members. On that account, sustained community-based health promotion intervention can be effective.

ObjectiveThis study explored multistakeholder perspectives on existing adolescent-specific tobacco control policies and programmes, to advance India’s transition towards a tobacco-free generation.DesignQualitative semi-structured interviews.SettingInterviews were conducted with officials involved in tobacco control at the national (India), state (Karnataka), district (Udupi) and village level. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.ParticipantsThirty-eight individuals representing national (n=9), state (n=9), district (n=14) and village (n=6) levels, participated.ResultsThe study findings highlighted the need to strengthen and amend the existing Tobacco Control Law (2003) provisions, particularly in the vicinity of schools (Sections 6a and 6b). Increasing the minimum legal age to buy tobacco from 18 to 21 years, developing an ‘application’ for ‘compliance and monitoring indicators’ in Tobacco-Free Educational Institution guidelines were proposed. Policies to address smokeless tobacco use, stricter enforcement including regular monitoring of existing programmes, and robust evaluation of policies was underscored. Engaging adolescents to co-create interventions was advocated, along with integrating national tobacco control programmes into existing school and adolescent health programmes, using both an intersectoral and whole-societal approach to prevent tobacco use, were recommended. Finally, stakeholders mentioned that when drafting and implementing a comprehensive national tobacco control policy, there is a need to adopt a vision striving toward a tobacco-free generation.ConclusionStrengthening and developing tobacco control programmes and policies are warranted which are monitored and evaluated rigorously, and where adolescents should be involved, accordingly.