PurposeThe optimal treatment strategy following local recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains unclear. While upfront SRS has been extensively studied, few reports focus on outcomes after retreatment. Here, we report the results following a second course of SRS for local recurrence of brain metastases previously treated with SRS.MethodsUsing institutional database, patients who received salvage SRS (SRS2) following in-field failure of initial SRS (SRS1) for brain metastases were identified. Radionecrosis and local failure were defined radiographically by MRI following SRS2. The primary endpoint was defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of all-cause death or last follow-up [overall survival (OS)]. The secondary endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS) and radionecrosis-free survival, defined as the time from SRS2 to the date of local failure or radionecrosis, or last follow-up, respectively.ResultsTwenty-eight patients with 32 brain metastases were evaluated between years 2004 and 2015. The median interval between SRS1 and SRS2 was 9.7 months. Median OS was 22.0 months. Median LFFS time after SRS2 was 13.6 months. The overall local control rate following SRS2 was 84.4%. The 1- and 2-year local control rates are 88.3% (95% CI, 76.7–100%) and 80.3% (95% CI, 63.5–100%), respectively. The overall rate of radionecrosis following SRS2 was 18.8%. On univariate analysis, higher prescribed isodose line (p = 0.033) and higher gross tumor volume (p = 0.015) at SRS1 were associated with radionecrosis. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward lower risk of radionecrosis with interval surgical resection, fractionated SRS, lower total EQD2 (<50 Gy), and lack of concurrent systemic therapy at SRS2.ConclusionIn select patients, repeat LINAC-based SRS following recurrence remains a reasonable option leading to long-term survival and local control. Radionecrosis approaches 20% for high risk individuals and parallels historic values.

No abstract

Additional prognostic factors refine prognostication in this larger contemporary cohort. Patterns of care have changed, and survival of RCC patients with BM has improved over time. The reasons for this improvement in survival remain unknown but may relate to more aggressive use of local brain metastasis therapy and a wider array of systemic treatment options for those patients with progressive extracranial tumor.

Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used for local control treatment of patients with intracranial metastases. As a result of SRS, some patients develop radiation‐induced necrosis. Radiographically, radiation‐induced necrosis can appear similar to tumor recurrence in magnetic resonance (MR) T1‐weighted contrast‐enhanced imaging, T2‐weighted MR imaging, and Fluid‐Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. Radiographic ambiguities often necessitate invasive brain biopsies to determine lesion etiology or cause delayed subsequent therapy initiation. We use a biomechanically coupled tumor growth model to estimate patient‐specific model parameters and model‐derived measures to noninvasively classify etiology of enhancing lesions in this patient population. Methods In this initial, preliminary retrospective study, we evaluated five patients with tumor recurrence and five with radiation‐induced necrosis. Longitudinal patient‐specific MR imaging data were used in conjunction with the model to parameterize tumor cell proliferation rate and tumor cell diffusion coefficient, and Dice correlation coefficients were used to quantify degree of correlation between model‐estimated mechanical stress fields and edema visualized from MR imaging. Results Results found four statistically relevant parameters which can differentiate tumor recurrence and radiation‐induced necrosis. Conclusions This preliminary investigation suggests potential of this framework to noninvasively determine the etiology of enhancing lesions in patients who previously underwent SRS for intracranial metastases.

Treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved from surgery alone to surgery plus adjuvant therapy. Preoperative 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-based chemoradiation with standard fractionated radiation, surgery utilizing total mesorectal excision, and further chemotherapy has become the standard of care in the USA. Preoperative adjuvant chemoradiation treatment sequencing has allowed for decreased toxicity, more sphincter-sparing surgery, and improved local control rates as compared to delivering the chemoradiation postoperatively. Yet, given the heterogeneity of locally advanced disease, some patients may be over-treated with this approach, leading to unnecessary toxicity and costs, while others may have a propensity to develop distant metastases and may benefit from intensified therapy. Therefore, the trend in modern clinical trial design has been to individualize therapy. As such, current studies are examining shortening the duration of radiation, omitting preoperative chemoradiation in patients who have a robust response to induction chemotherapy alone, omitting or delaying surgery in patients who have a clinical complete response to preoperative chemoradiation, and completing all of the adjuvant treatment prior to surgery.