Purpose: To evaluate feasibility and safety of execution of optimized intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) plan of first fraction in subsequent fractions in high-volume, low-resource centers.Material and methods: This non-randomized prospective study included 30 cervical cancer patients, who underwent 4 fractions of high-dose-rate (HDR)-ICBT in 2 applications, one week apart, 2 fractions per application delivered on two consecutive days. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was done before each fraction, organs at risk (OARs) were contoured on all sets of CT images. Optimized plans were generated for each set of CT images and executed for the treatment. Test treatment plans were retrospectively generated by applying first treatment fraction's dwell times adjusted for decay, and dwell positions of the applicator for subsequent treatment fractions paired t-test was performed to analyze D 2cc dose variations of OARs among the paired sets of plans.Results: Comparison between the plans showed daily plans provided lower D 2cc to OARs than test plans. In intraapplication plan comparison, there was a significant dose reduction to 2 cc sigmoid (p = 0.021) and bladder (p = 0.007) in daily plan. Mean D 2cc of optimized and unoptimized plans were 361.35 ±114.01 and 411.70 ±152.73 for sigmoid, and 511.23 ±85.47 cGy and 553.57 ±111.23 cGy for bladder, respectively. In inter-application, D 2cc rectum and sigmoid demonstrated a statistically significant dose variation (p = 0.002) and (p = 0.007), with mean D 2cc rectum of optimized and unoptimized plans being 401.06 ±83.53 cGy and 452.46 ±123.97 cGy, and of 2 cc sigmoid 340.84 ±117.90 cGy and 387.79 ±141.36 cGy, respectively.Conclusions: Fractionated HDR brachytherapy amounts to significant variation in OAR doses if re-simulation and re-plan is not performed for every fraction and ICBT application. Therefore, plan of the day with optimization of the doses to target and OARs must be followed for each fraction.

Introduction Concurrent chemotherapy integrated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Simultaneous integrated boost technique has allowed differential doses to primary and normal structures permitting significant toxicity reduction. The current study explores the feasibility of the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) technique to enhance cytoreduction and explore the possibility of dose intensification with radiobiologically targeted treatment condensation. Methods Thirty patients were randomized in an open-labeled study to receive concurrent chemoradiation of 60 Gy in 25 fractions with “SMART” technique or 70 Gy in 35 fractions using conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy simultaneous integrated boost “IMRT SIB.” The primary endpoints included comparative volumetric cytoreduction between the study and control arm assessed during the course of treatment and final response evaluation. Secondary endpoints involved the assessment of acute toxicity parameters for xerostomia, mucositis, dysphagia, and fatigue. Results The “SMART” study arm showed comparable volumetric cytoreduction to the conventional “IMRT SIB” arm at midtreatment (p-value = 0.225) as well as toward completion (p-value = 0.476). The study arm did observe 94.4% cytoreduction of tumor volume compared with 88.05% in the conventional arm at the time of response evaluation. In spite of treatment condensation, there was no significant increase in toxicity with “SMART.” There was no difference in the frequency or duration of grade 3 mucositis in the “SMART” arm in spite of intensification (p-value = 0.728). In the “SMART” arm, there was a favorable reduction in the duration of grade ⅔ dysphagia; 2.8 weeks versus 4.6 weeks (p-value = 0.002). Even though the xerostomia was comparable in frequency and intensity, the total duration of xerostomia was 50% less (p-value = 0.001). Conclusions The “SMART” technique provides a radiobiologically sound, effective, and safe protocol that has the potential to improve the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. The good tolerability and toxicity profile in the study arm is encouraging and facilitates further research.