Background In April 2017, the Thai Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) was alerted to a potential malaria outbreak among civilians and military personnel in Sisaket Province, a highly forested area bordering Cambodia. The objective of this study was to present findings from the joint civilian-military outbreak response. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to assess risk factors among cases reported during the 2017 Sisaket malaria outbreak. Routine malaria surveillance data from January 2013 to March 2018 obtained from public and military medical reporting systems and key informant interviews (KIIs) (n = 72) were used to develop hypotheses about potential factors contributing to the outbreak. Joint civilian-military response activities included entomological surveys, mass screen and treat (MSAT) and vector control campaigns, and scale-up of the “1–3–7” reactive case detection approach among civilians alongside a pilot “1–3–7” study conducted by the Royal Thai Army (RTA). Results Between May–July 2017, the monthly number of MoPH-reported cases surpassed the epidemic threshold. Outbreak cases detected through the MoPH mainly consisted of Thai males (87%), working as rubber tappers (62%) or military/border police (15%), and Plasmodium vivax infections (73%). Compared to cases from the previous year (May–July 2016), outbreak cases were more likely to be rubber tappers (OR = 14.89 [95% CI: 5.79–38.29]; p < 0.001) and infected with P. vivax (OR=2.32 [1.27–4.22]; p = 0.006). Themes from KIIs were congruent with findings from routine surveillance data. Though limited risk factor information was available from military cases, findings from RTA’s “1–3–7” study indicated transmission was likely occurring outside military bases. Data from entomological surveys and MSAT campaigns support this hypothesis, as vectors were mostly exophagic and parasite prevalence from MSAT campaigns was very low (range: 0-0.7% by PCR/microscopy). Conclusions In 2017, an outbreak of mainly P. vivax occurred in Sisaket Province, affecting mainly military and rubber tappers. Vector control use was limited to the home/military barracks, indicating that additional interventions were needed during high-risk forest travel periods. Importantly, this outbreak catalyzed joint civilian-military collaborations and integration of the RTA into the national malaria elimination strategy (NMES). The Sisaket outbreak response serves as an example of how civilian and military public health systems can collaborate to advance national malaria elimination goals in Southeast Asia and beyond.

No abstract

Introduction The effective dual antibiotics ceftriaxone (CRO) and azithromycin (AZM) have successfully treated Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) infection, however, the CRO- and AZM-resistant strains have been sporadically detected globally and in Thailand. Furthermore, there are no currently antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the GC isolates obtained from soldiers reported in Thailand. Hence, this is the first study to describe the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of GC isolates obtained from predominately soldiers who seeking care at Military Camp Hospitals, in Thailand from 2014 to 2020. Materials and Methods A total of 624 symptomatic gonococcal samples were received from 10 military hospitals during 2014-2020. They were collected from urethral swabs and inoculated into selective media. The suspected GC isolates were subcultured and presumptively identified using conventional microbiology techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by Etest to determine minimal inhibitory concentration (μg/mL) against AZM, benzylpenicillin, cefepime, cefixime, ceftriaxone (CRO), ciprofloxacin, spectinomycin, and tetracycline using the criteria outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. This study was approved by Institutional Review Board, Royal Thai Army Medical Department under protocol number S036b/56 and Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and Silver Spring, MD under protocol number WR #2039. Results A total of 624 samples were collected from symptomatic gonococcal infectious patients with 91.5% (571/624) of samples obtained from soldiers. Of those, 78% (488/624) were identified as GC and 92% (449/488) of them were isolated from soldiers. All GC samples collected were susceptible to CRO (first-line treatment) with only one GC isolate identified as non-susceptible to cefepime and three isolates identified as non-susceptible to AZM. Conclusion The recommended dual treatment of GC infections with CRO and AZM is currently an effective empirical treatment for patients who are seeking care at military hospitals in Thailand. Nevertheless, cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with documented high activity against GC strains equal to other “third-generation” cephalosporins such as CRO. Due to the active duty of military personnel, they concerned about the confidentiality and frequently seek treatment at civilian clinics. Additionally, due to the availability of antibiotics over the counter in Thailand, many choose the option to self-medicate without a physician’s prescription. These could be subsequently driven the gradual increase of multidrug-resistant gonococcal strains throughout the country. Thus, the GC surveillance would be needed for further Force Health Protection and public health authorities in response to the drug-resistant GC threats.

No abstract