Results of students' need analysis show that grammar (tenses) is the students' lowest ability that they wanted to learn at that time. In order to cope with that contextual situation, Formula 33 is proposed to be the main concern on the learning English for students of non-English deparment at Islamic University in the academic year 2012/2013.Students must write reflections -express their emotion and knowledge gain in the form of essay to e-learning provided -every time the class end. The students' reflections were considered as data. The data were classified based on some categories/themes descriptively. Those data are then read very carefully to find out the keywords that became the instruments to classify them into themes, while irrelevant data were sorted.The results show that learning English through Formula 33 addressed in three aspects -learning domain, teaching delivery, and students' best practice. In learning domain, students have positive and negative cognitive feedback. Formula 33 was considered improving their skills especially in writing English sentences with correct grammatical structure as well as they have excellent attitude toward Formula. In teaching delivery that consists of two keywords method and materials. Students said that both method and materials are super.
The objective was to investigate students’ attitude toward the implementation of a whole language approach on Reading and Writing for Occupational Purposes Course in the academic year of 2013/2014. The approaches employed were phonological and phoneme awareness, phonic and word study, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension skills and strategies, and writing. The participants were 15 students of the English Language Education Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia. SCORE questionnaire using the Likert’s scale was the instrument. Calculation was to find out score index and categorization by following Riduwan’s (2007) score interpretation criteria. The findings showed that in the simple category, two of ten questions were agreed absolutely (100%), in the clear category, all questions were agreed for 80 %, in the original category, five of thirteen questions reached majority of agreement (100%), in the relevant category, one of five questions was agreed absolutely (100%), and in the enjoyable category, all questions were agreed by 93%. Keywords: a whole language approach, SCORE, score interpretation criteria PENGUKURAN SIKAP MAHASISWA TENTANG PERKULIAHAN BERBASIS A WHOLE LANGUAGE APPROACH DENGAN KUESIONER SCORE Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengukur sikap mahasiswa terhadap pelaksanaan a whole language approach dalam perkuliahan Reading and Writing for Occupational Purposes Course tahun akademik 2013/2014. Pendekatan yang diterapkan adalah kesadaran fonetik dan fonemik, pelafalan dan kata, kelancaran, kosakata, keterampilan dan strategi membaca komprehensif, dan menulis. Responden penelitian ini adalah 15 maahsiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Islam Indonesia. Kuesioner SCOREs dengan skala Likert sebagai instrumen. Penghitungan ditujukan kepada skor indeks dan kategorisasi mengikuti criteria interpretasi skor Riduwan (2007). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pada kategori simple, dua pertanyaan disetujui mutlak (100%), pada kategori clear, semua pertanyaan disetujui sebesar 80%, pada kategori original, lima pertanyaan disetujui mutlak (100%), pada kategori relevant, satu pertanyaan disetujui mutlak (100%), dan pada kategori enjoyable, semua pertanyaan disetujui sebesar 93%. Kata Kunci: pendekatan a whole language, kuesioner SCORE, kriteria interpretasi skor
To comprehend that a language belongs to a dialect, one may examine its lexicon. As it is considered non-standard dialect, the American African English lexicon is assumed to have its own characteristic different from the standardAmerican English. Therefore, to gain a better comprehension ofthe American African English dialect in the view point of lexicon features, the paper will elaborate Georgia Doyle Johnson's Frederick Douglas And LoraineHansberry's ARaisinlnThe Sun. This paper is descriptive linguistics rather than a stylistic study as it does not focus on literary style. The data taken was classified into linguistic elements and was tested to the theories of informal English in general; African American English in particular and Standard American English rules of pronunciation. The research findings were summarized and discussed to conclude the research.The result of the research demonstrates that African American English, a variant ofinformal English, is different from the rules ofStandardAmerican English. In terms of lexicon, African American English employs local and mde words. The presence of slang and colloquialisms, taboo words and swearing make it distinctively informal.
To study of syntax, the concept of structure is fundamental. However structure itself is a viery general concept and most of the language learners are assumed that their understanding about sentence is obvious. For many people, a sentence isconsidered groupof words. Thisideaisriot appropriate when a deep study offundamentalidea ofa sentence is done.Linguistically speaking, sentences are not formed by words alone but by structural units known as constituents. The coi^tituent has a certain specifiable function in the structureof the thing as a whole. However, the. fundamental idea of a sentence grammatically is that a sentence consists of phrase.Therefore, sentence(S)consistsofnoun phrase(NP)andverbphrase (VP).The idea of phrase here is to accommodate even a single constituent Aat a sentence has.The basic principle of sentence, therefore, is S=NP+VP. It is obvious that NP and VP directly form a sentence. Furthermore, in terms of relation that the phrase may have in a sentence, there are four kinds of phrase relation in a sentence. They are modification, complementation, predication, and coordination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.