Objective There are few large studies on facial feminization surgery (FFS). We provide the largest comprehensive report to date of an FFS cohort regarding the safety of multilevel surgery, patient-specific considerations with FFS procedures, and complications of surgery. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Multicenter integrated health care system. Subjects and Methods We examined all patients undergoing FFS within our institution from April 2016 to October 2018. Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria underwent any combination of scalp advancement, cranioplasty, brow lift, rhinoplasty, upper lip lift, mandibuloplasty, chondrolaryngoplasty, and/or additional cosmetic procedures. Medical records were reviewed for preoperative characteristics, FFS procedures undergone, and postoperative complications. Results In total, 121 patients underwent a total of 594 FFS procedures. Seventy-five percent of patients had only 1 or no comorbidities, and 90% of patients underwent cranioplasty, scalp advancement, and brow lift. African American patients (n = 5) less commonly underwent cranioplasty compared to those of other ethnicities (white, P < .001; Asian, P = .022; Hispanic, P = .014; multiracial, P = .006). Asian patients less commonly underwent rhinoplasty than white patients (38% vs 73%, P = .023). Only 8 (6.6%) patients experienced a significant complication after surgery. Conclusions The population undergoing FFS is generally healthy, the upper third of the face is most commonly addressed, there are age and ethnic considerations in FFS, and major complications after multilevel surgery are uncommon.

No abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to implement pediatric vertical evacuation disaster training and evaluate its effectiveness by using a full-scale exercise to compare outcomes in trained and untrained participants. Methods: Various clinical and nonclinical staff in a tertiary care university hospital received pediatric vertical evacuation training sessions over a 6-wk period. The training consisted of disaster and evacuation didactics, hands-on training in use of evacuation equipment, and implementation of an evacuation toolkit. An unannounced full-scale simulated vertical evacuation of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Drill participants completed a validated evaluation tool. Pearson chi-squared testing was used to analyze the data. Results: Eighty-four evaluations were received from drill participants. Forty-three (51%) of the drill participants received training and 41 (49%) did not. Staff who received pediatric evacuation training were more likely to feel prepared compared with staff who did not (odds ratio, 4.05; confidence interval: 1.05-15.62). Conclusions: There was a statistically significant increase in perceived preparedness among those who received training. Recently trained pediatric practitioners were able to achieve exercise objectives on par with the regularly trained emergency department staff. Pediatric disaster preparedness training may mitigate the risks associated with caring for children during disasters.

No abstract