Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a reliable, objective and reproducible method of summative assessment of clinical competence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of OSCE for summative evaluation of final year medical students in both Internal Medicine and Surgery. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of summative assessment of final-year medical students in Internal Medicine and Surgery at College of Medicine, Enugu State University of Science and Technology. The students’ clinical competence was tested by OSCE. The OSCE consisted of two parts. The A part (picture OSCE, replacing traditional short cases) in which questions were given to students from slide shows. The B part (clinical OSCE, replacing traditional long case) consisted of clinical OSCE stations to test students’ ability and skills in history taking, physical examination, counselling/communication skills, ability to make diagnosis, interpretation of laboratory/radiological results and ability to manage common medical emergencies and conditions. The students' scores in the picture OSCE, clinical OSCE, and final total clinical score scores in both Internal Medicine and Surgery were collated and subjected to analysis with SPSS version 25 (IBM; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Correlation was assessed by Pearson correlation, mean scores compared with paired t-test, reliability assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Statistical significance was considered as p <0.05. A total of 120 students sat for the examinations. There were significant positive correlations between students’ score in Surgery clinical OSCE and Internal Medicine clinical OSCE, r =0.617 (p=0.000); students’ scores in Surgery picture OSCE and Internal Medicine Picture OSCE, r=0.647 (p=0.000); and students’ scores in Surgery clinical examinations and Internal Medicine clinical examinations, r= 0.750 (p=0.000). The reliability of Surgery clinical examinations was 0.851 while the reliability of Internal Medicine clinical examinations was 0.816. OSCE is a more reliable tool than traditional method for the summative assessment of final year medical students. OSCE gives a higher correlation coefficient and Cronbach alpha than the traditional method of assessment.

Patients' satisfaction with waiting time and the facilities in eye clinics is an important indication of the patients' assessment of the quality of service in the eye clinic. In this study, waiting time was defined as time spent from arrival to time when the patient is seen by a doctor. Some factors that affect patients' waiting time in health clinics include: healthcare setting, availability of adequate resources and personnel, efficient deployment of available resources and competence of healthcare workers, and punctuality of healthcare workers. The physical environment, comfort of patients, and level of infrastructure in the hospital also influence patients' satisfaction. This observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among patients that attended an eye care clinic, in a tertiary hospital, and 348 respondents were interviewed. Most of the respondents were aged 40 years and above (64.4%), females (63.5%), Igbos by tribe (94.8%), married (63.2%), Christians (96.6%), and had at least a secondary level of education (78.4%). Most perceived waiting time as being very long or long (60.1%), and only 48.8 were satisfied or very satisfied with the waiting time. Most also perceived the cleanliness of the eye clinic as being clean or very clean (85.0%), and 70.7% perceived the ventilation as being adequate or very adequate. The majority reported that a health talk was given (71.6%), and 62.7% were satisfied or very satisfied with the talk. More respondents (46.8%) perceived the waiting space as very inadequate or inadequate, as against 43.4% that perceived it as adequate or very adequate. More reported that prescribed drugs were completely unavailable How to cite this paper: Okoloagu, N.N. and Ndibuagu, E.O. (2023) Patients' Perception and Satisfaction with Waiting Time, and Facilities Available in a State Teaching Hos-

Despite the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Nigeria, population based studies are scarce. This situation is worse in rural areas where the people are typically poor, not very educated and lack good hospitals. We aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among rural dwellers in Agbani, a semi-urban municipality in South East Nigeria. This was a preliminary, observational, cross-sectional investigation in which 400 adults were recruited using the 5 autonomous communities that make up Agbani as clusters. We randomly selected the initial 80 consenting adults from each village. Blood glucose levels were measured using a glucometer. Data obtained were analyzed using SPSS. There were 382 adults studied. There were 170 males and 212 females. The mean age was 59.37 ±15.90 years. Mean Blood Sugar was 135.69±85.94 mg/dl. The prevalence rate for hyperglycemia in this study was 20.14% or 201 persons per 1,000 rural population. There was no statistical difference between the mean blood sugar of males and females and no significant correlation between age and blood sugar.