URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01530724.

DNA methylation is known to regulate transcription and was recently found to be involved in exon recognition via cotranscriptional splicing. We recently observed that exon-intron architectures can be grouped into two classes: one with higher GC content in exons compared to the flanking introns, and the other with similar GC content in exons and introns. The first group has higher nucleosome occupancy on exons than introns, whereas the second group exhibits weak nucleosome marking of exons, suggesting another type of epigenetic marker distinguishes exons from introns when GC content is similar. We find different and specific patterns of DNA methylation in each of the GC architectures; yet in both groups, DNA methylation clearly marks the exons. Exons of the leveled GC architecture exhibit a significantly stronger DNA methylation signal in relation to their flanking introns compared to exons of the differential GC architecture. This is accentuated by a reduction of the DNA methylation level in the intronic sequences in proximity to the splice sites and shows that different epigenetic modifications mark the location of exons already at the DNA level. Also, lower levels of methylated CpGs on alternative exons can successfully distinguish alternative exons from constitutive ones. Three positions at the splice sites show high CpG abundance and accompany elevated nucleosome occupancy in a leveled GC architecture. Overall, these results suggest that DNA methylation affects exon recognition and is influenced by the GC architecture of the exon and flanking introns.

A Mediterranean and low carbohydrate diet decreases hepatic fat more than a low-fat diet, beyond visceral fat changes. Decreases in hepatic fat are independently associated with specific improved parameters. The beneficial effect of a Mediterranean diet over a low-fat diet is mainly mediated by decreases in hepatic fat.

Intron density is highly variable across eukaryotic species. It seems that different lineages have experienced considerably different levels of intron gain and loss events, but the reasons for this are not well known. A large number of mechanisms for intron loss and gain have been suggested, and most of them have at least some level of indirect support. We therefore figured out that the variability in intron density can be a reflection of the fact that different mechanisms are active in different lineages. Quite a number of these putative mechanisms, both for intron loss and for intron gain, postulate that the enzyme reverse transcriptase (RT) has a key role in the process. In this paper, we lay out three predictions whose approval or falsification gives indication for the involvement of RT in intron gain and loss processes. Testing these predictions requires data on the intron gain and loss rates of individual genes along different branches of the eukaryotic phylogenetic tree. So far, such rates could not be computed, and hence, these predictions could not be rigorously evaluated. Here, we use a maximum likelihood algorithm that we have devised in the past, Evolutionary Reconstruction by Expectation Maximization, which allows the estimation of such rates. Using this algorithm, we computed the intron loss and gain rates of more than 300 genes in each branch of the phylogenetic tree of 19 eukaryotic species. Based on that we found only little support for RT activity in intron gain. In contrast, we suggest that RT-mediated intron loss is a mechanism that is very efficient in removing introns, and thus, its levels of activity may be a major determinant of intron number. Moreover, we found that intron gain and loss rates are negatively correlated in intron-poor species but are positively correlated for intron-rich species. One explanation to this is that intron gain and loss mechanisms in intron-rich species (like metazoans) share a common mechanistic component, albeit not a RT.

No abstract