The current study used an eye tracker to examine how auditory input affects the latency of visual saccades, fixations, and response times while using variations of a Serial Response Time (SRT) task. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a repeating sequence of visual stimuli that appeared in different locations on a computer monitor and they had to quickly determine if each visual stimulus was red/blue. The visual sequence was either presented in silence or paired with tones. Compared with the silent condition, the tones slowed down red/blue discriminations and delayed the latency of first fixations to the visual stimuli. To ensure the interference was not occurring during the decision or response phase and to better understand the nature of auditory interference, we removed the red/blue discrimination task in Experiment 2, manipulated cognitive load, and developed a gaze-contingent procedure where the timing of each visual stimulus was dependent on a saccade crossing a gaze-contingent boundary surrounding the target. Participants were slower at initiating their saccades or fixations and made more fixations under high load. As in Experiment 1, auditory interference was found with participants being more likely to fixate on the visual stimuli and were faster at fixating on the visual stimuli in the unimodal condition. These findings suggest that auditory interference effects occur early in the course of processing and provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying modality dominance effects. Public Significance StatementMost of our everyday experiences involve the combination of both sights and sounds. However, we know very little about how the brain integrates this information. The current study examined how quickly individuals could detect and respond to visual information and how simple tones affected this process.