AIM: This randomized clinical study aimed to assess bone height loss when using mandibular implant overdentures retained by two and four endosseous implants using the telescopic attachments. METHODS: Twelve completely edentulous patients were randomly allocated so that six patients were treated by telescopic implant overdenture retained by two implants (group A) and six patients were treated with overdentures retained by four implants (group B). Digital radiographic evaluation of bone height using Digora was made starting at the functional loading day followed by time intervals of 12 months. RESULTS: No implant loss during the healing period or after functional loading. Radiographic evaluation revealed a statistically significant difference was found between (Group A) and (Group B) were (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For bone loss, widely distributed four intraforaminal implants revealed more bone preservation than only two implants when using the telescopic attachments to support and retain an over dentures taking in consideration the type of the attachment will be used.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disc displacement is a widely faced clinical condition and the management options are vast with varying difficulty and success rates. This study aims to evaluate the use of Botulinum Toxin injection and dextrose prolotherapy for such cases.Methods: 20 joints were included in this study divided into 2 groups; Group 1 receiving 25% 3mL Dextrose injection (with local anesthetic and saline solution) into the retrodiscal region while group 2 received 35 U Botulinum Toxin -Type A injection in the lateral pterygoid muscle. Pain (according to the visual analogue scale), clicking and maximal interincisal opening were assessed preoperatively and at 4 months followup. Results:The results showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. The click disappeared in 7/10 joints in group 1 and 9/10 in group 2. The maximal interincisal opening was regained and slightly increased in all participants of the study. All patients reported better pain scores at the end of the followup period. Conclusions:Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that both treatment options tested are considered acceptable in the management of TMJ anterior disc displacement with reduction. Moreover, the results do not allow recommending one over the other as no statistically significant differences were found.

BACKGROUND: Short implants have been proposed as an option for management of deficient alveolar ridges without the need for complex augmentation procedures. AIM: In this study, we aim to assess the use of short and ultrashort implants for the management of deficient alveolar ridges in posterior mandibular and maxillary areas with a 1-year post-loading follow-up. METHODOLOGY: Ten patients were recruited in this trial with a total of 14 implants to be placed. The patients all needed implants in the maxillary/mandibular posterior regions for prosthetic rehabilitation with deficient alveolar ridge heights. Implants of 5 mm diameter and lengths either 6 or 8.5 mm were to be placed in the edentulous spaces after proper radiographic assessment. Two-stage surgeries were followed with ¾ months between implant placement and loading. The follow-up lasted for a year to allow for peri-implant clinical assessment and radiographic analysis. RESULTS: All patients showed uneventful healing and no infection, wound dehiscence or inflammation was noted. Prosthetic rehabilitation was successful and satisfactory to the patients. None of the cases showed excessive marginal bone loss and stability was maintained at acceptable levels to the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, short and ultrashort implants seem like a valid option for management of posterior edentulous regions with deficient ridge heights.