Various tranexamic acid (TA) formulations have been evaluated for treating melasma, yet the effectiveness of this therapy has not been efficiently comparatively analyzed. To assess and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of TA 5% vs hydroquinone (HQ) 4% creams in treating melasma. 100 melasma female patients were treated with daily application of TA 5% cream on right-sided facial lesions and HQ 4% cream on left-sided lesions for 12 weeks. Photographic documentation using digital and Antera 3D camera, Wood's light examination, calculation of Hemi Melasma Area and Severity Index (Hemi MASI), Melasma quality of life (MELASQOL) scores and area% of melanin through histopathological examination was done before and after treatment. Both TA 5% and HQ 4% creams yielded significant improvement of all melasma lesions after 12 weeks of treatment, with no significant difference in treatment response regarding Hemi MASI, MELASQOL scores and Antera average level of melanin (P > .05); however, significant reduction in area % of melanin was recorded with TA 5% than HQ 4% creams (P = .000). TA appears to be a promising therapeutic option in treating melasma with fewer adverse effects, same or even better results in comparison to HQ cream.
Background Melasma is a chronic, acquired pigmentary disorder characterized by gray-brown macules and patches affecting photodistributed part of the face such as the bridge of the nose, cheek, upper lip, forehead, and mandible. It is seen mostly in women of reproductive age group and has an onset usually after pregnancy. However, in around 10% of the cases, males are also affected. Objectives The aim of our study was to assess and compare the therapeutic effects of tranexamic acid cream versus hydroquinone 4% cream in treating patients with melasma. Patients and Methods This prospective split face comparative study included thirty three patients with their age ranging from 18 to 40 years, participated for treatment of different types of melasma, recruited from outpatient clinic of Dermatology department Ain Shams University Hospitals during the period from January to June 2019. The study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and fulfilled all the ethical aspects required in human research. All patients received full information about description of the procedure of treatment, possible side effects, photo documentation and they all provided informed consent. Results Both topical TA and HQ 4% cream were efficient in treatment of different types of melasma as shown by significant decrease in Hemi MASI score, patient satisfaction score, significant decrease in average level of melanin measured by Antera 3D camera and significant decrease in area % of melanin by histopathological evaluation after 3 months of treatment, although slight recurrence of melasma was observed one month after stopping both treatments. Meanwhile, no significant difference was observed in treatment response of TA and HQ regarding Hemi MASI score, patient satisfaction score, average level of melanin (Antera 3D camera). This could be attributed to the small number of included patients. Conclusion We concluded that the TA appears to be a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of melasma. TA has fewer adverse effects, same or even better results in comparison with other melasma targeting therapies as hydroquinone cream.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.