This paper presents selected findings from a questionnaire completed by 509 primary school teachers in Scotland. Drawing on policy enactment theory, the paper focusses on teachers' personal experiences of physical education and perceptions of the importance of physical education in their schools. More than half (56%) reported that physical education was either 'very important' or 'important', while almost 40% perceived it to be of 'limited' or 'very limited importance'. 'Staff', 'time' and 'subject status' were the main themes they drew on to explain their responses. Our findings highlight the diverse nature of the physical education professional cultures in Scottish primary schools. From this, we propose that future initiatives to support change in primary physical education should, as a starting point, acknowledge these diverse professional cultures and move beyond the simplistic one-size-fits-all change projects that have been shown to have limited impact on practice.

No abstract

No abstract

No pain, no gain': former elite female gymnasts' engagements with pain and injury discourses This paper investigates former elite female gymnasts' views and experiences of pain and injury. The purpose of the study was to examine how participants engaged with pain and injury discourses and interrogate the ways in which certain knowledge and practices had become dominant. A Foucaultian theoretical framework underpinned the study, making use of Foucault's work on discourses, power and resistance. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with seven former elite gymnasts. By analysing the participants' talk through poststructural discourse analysis, three themes were identified. Firstly, participants' persistence through pain and injury was due to the desire to compete. Secondly, participants differentiated between 'good pain' and 'bad pain'. Thirdly, participants had a higher tolerance for pain than for injury. This research raises questions about the dominance of a 'no pain, no gain' discourse, and the ways in which gymnasts may develop an uncritical acceptance of particular 'truths' surrounding pain and injury.

This paper reports on one aspect of a study that investigated the place and meaning of 'physical education' to practitioners and children at three preschool settings in Scotland. We employed a poststructural type of discourse analysis to examine the developmental discourses the 14 participating practitioners drew on when talking about 'physical education' at preschools, during semi-structured interviews. Three main discourses around the notion of developmentalism were identified during analysis of the adults' interview data: (1) preschool children learn and develop through play; (2) preschool children should have choices and freedom; and (3) sometimes more structured activities are needed. The practitioners were heavily invested in developmental 'truths' about how preschool children learn and develop. They were in agreement that play is a vital element of preschool education, and that, consequently, children should be provided with opportunities for exploration and making choices. However, they also talked about sometimes 'needing' to restrict children's freedom and provide more adult-led activities. Our findings illustrate the strength of developmental discourses at the three settings. We suggest that preschool practitioners, as well as policy-makers and researchers, should critically reflect on the effects of taken-forgranted developmental discourses, and move beyond thinking in terms of binaries such as 'physical education versus play' or 'structure versus freedom'.