Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent form of skin cancer and is not a tumor with a lethal outcome if diagnosed and treated adequately. The gold standard for treatment is surgical excision with histologically safe margins. Even so, tumors excised with free margins may recur after a period of time. The identification of predictive factors for the recurrence of BCCs besides the localization, size and aggressive histology may be useful for the clinician. The aim of the present study was to identify clinical and pathological factors associated with recurrence in tumors with histologically free margins and assess via immunohistochemical staining, the expression of glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1), yes-associated protein (YAP), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and E-cadherin as they are involved in the development of BCCs, in the hope of identifying markers that are predictive for recurrence. In total, 8 recurrent BCCs and 38 non-recurrent tumors were analyzed. A Breslow index >2 (Se 100.0%, Sp 67.5%, P=0.008), Clark level >3 (Se 100.0%, Sp 47.5%, P<0.001), and excision margins both lateral (Se 87.5%, Sp 60.0%, P=0.04) and deep (Se 75.0%, Sp 82.5%, P<0.001) free from tumoral cells ≤1 mm proved to be predictive for recurrence in the present study. Recurrence may appear even after more than 3 years since the initial excision (Se 87.50%, Sp 70.0%, P<0.001). The expression levels of GLI1, YAP and E-cadherin were not different in the recurrent vs. non-recurrent BCCs. However, the low expression of CTGF may indicate a tumor with a higher aggressiveness. In conclusion, close follow-up of patients with excised BCCs at least annually is recommended and re-excision should be taken into consideration for locally advanced tumors especially if they are located in high-risk areas or those with histologically free margins <1 mm.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected the healthcare system in our country and led non-COVID patients to postpone medical visits that were not urgent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends in melanoma diagnosis and to compare the pathological characteristics of melanoma patients before and during the pandemic. The number of primary cutaneous melanomas diagnosed each month between 1st March 2019 and 29th February 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and between 1st March 2020 and 28th February 2021 (COVID-19) in the North-Western Region of Romania (Cluj and Bihor counties) was determined. The pathological characteristics of melanomas diagnosed in the two intervals were compared. The number of melanoma diagnoses substantially decreased during the pandemic, with 66 (−19.3%) fewer cutaneous melanomas being diagnosed in the first year of the pandemic when compared with the previous year. The tumor thickness and mitotic rate were significantly higher in cases found during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study suggests that COVID-19 has delayed diagnosis in patients with melanoma, leading to the detection of thicker melanomas that may increase morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the consequences of this delay on outcomes.

Giant condyloma acuminatum (GCA), or Buschke-Löwenstein tumor (BLT), represents an infrequent sexually transmitted disease (STD), caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), especially genotype 6 or 11. There are numerous risk factors for HPV, such as multiple sexual partners, homosexuality, prostitution, chronic genital infections, as well as the lack of proper hygiene. HPV infection is a field infection, where large areas of cells at a tissue surface are affected by the HPV virus; therefore, once the GCA is excised, treatment of the whole affected genital area needs to be undertaken. The treatment is classified into topical therapy (podophyllin, 5-FU, radiotherapy, topical photodynamic therapy), excisional therapy (CO 2 laser, cryotherapy, electrotherapy, surgery) and immunotherapy (imiquimod). However, the 'gold standard' therapy is represented by wide surgical excision without grafting, since it is considered that healing per secundam is an improved approach, because there is no risk of recurrences on fibrotic tissue. A total of 7 cases of the BLT with comorbidities and particularities are presented and it is recommended that it be taken into consideration that the incidence of the disease is increasing, emphasizing the importance of an early diagnosis, as well as an adequate treatment.

Melanoma is one of the most immunogenic tumors among human neoplasms, with numerous clinical observations of partial or completely regressed tumors. It is an aggressive tumor, with the greatest reported number of somatic mutations, BRAF mutation being the most common one. BRAF mutation is also present in a higher percentage in benign nevi. Complete regression of primary tumor and involution of nevi are, however, rare phenomenon in melanoma that can appear in relation with UV exposure, surgical trauma, target therapy in melanoma, pregnancy or host immune response to an evolving melanoma tumor. We present the case of a 58-year-old man with a completely regressed metastatic melanoma who developed a second melanoma with concomitant involution of papillomatous nevi under BRAF inhibitors treatment. In reviewed literature we have found 53 cases of completely regressed primary melanomas, neither of them reporting nevi involution. Complete regression of primary tumor can occur as an immune response to tumor progression. Nevi can involute under BRAF inhibitor therapy, but development of new malignant lesions under BRAF inhibitors is linked to BRAF wild-type. Documentation of primary tumor and dynamic changes in nevi highlight the need of a good clinical skin examination and increase the utility of baseline and sequential dermoscopy in melanoma.

Background Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting. Objective We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology. Methods We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE, G-I-N, and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of four general surgeons practicing colorectal surgery, a radiologist with expertise in rectal cancer, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, and a patient representative. We conducted a systematic review and the results of evidence synthesis by means of meta-analyses were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus. Results This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation for the use of TaTME over laparoscopic or robotic TME for low rectal cancer when expertise is available. Furthermore, it details evidence gaps to be addressed by future research and discusses policy considerations. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries, and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494. Conclusions This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the use of TaTME for rectal cancer.