The value of screening for cervical cancer has been proven. Such screening in developed countries has achieved a decrease in incidence and mortality by about 80%. Although screening facilities are available in certain parts of developing countries, the incidence of cervical cancer remains very high and many patients present with late stage disease. The study was performed among women from different socioeconomic circumstances (low, middle, and upper social/financial backgrounds). The assessment was performed by means of a questionnaire. The majority of patients from lower socio-economic circumstances with multiple risk factors were not aware of cervical screening or facilities available for this purpose. However, in spite of knowledge of cervical screening and the availability of such services, the majority of women (87%) from higher social and educational backgrounds did not undergo cervical screening. Most patients resided within a 12-kilometer radius of a facility that either provided or could potentially provide screening. Although some patients (36.7%) had had a screening test performed at some time in the past, only 27.3% of patients reported having had a Pap test. This was due to failure on the part of the healthcare giver to disseminate information to the patient regarding the reason and value of cervical screening. Among women from higher socioeconomic groups, the level of education was better and knowledge of the Pap test was not age-dependent. We conclude that the mere provision of a cervical cancer screening service is not sufficient to ensure successful uptake since screening is a multifaceted entity. Improvement of socioeconomic and educational circumstances should improve the uptake of a screening program only if the healthcare giver provides appropriate information to the patient and the patient takes the initiative to avail themselves of such screening.
Background. The 2-year internship period for medical graduates began in South Africa in 2005 and has never been formally evaluated. Objective. This study assessed the perceptions of community service medical officers (COSMOs) working at district hospitals (DHs) in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) to determine whether the 2-year internship programme had adequately prepared them for community service (CS). Method. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted regarding the perceptions of COSMOs working at 22 district hospitals in KZN. Data were collected in July 2012, using a questionnaire based on the core skills and knowledge detailed in the Health Professions Council of South Africa intern log book. All eight domains were self-assessed and a score of 4 out of 5 indicated an ability to work independently. Results. Of the COSMOs, 78% (60 out of 89) completed the questionnaire. Most felt well-prepared for CS in all disciplines, but critical gaps in knowledge and skills were identified in paediatrics, orthopaedics, anaesthetics and obstetrics. In addition, 75% of respondents (45 out of 60) expressed a need for additional training in the disciplines of ear, nose and throat (ENT), urology, ophthalmology and dermatology. Conclusion. The 2-year internship has provided the basis for independent medical practice in DHs. However, certain critical skill gaps need urgent attention, particularly in obstetrics and anaesthesia. Areas of weakness in ENT, urology, ophthalmology and dermatology could be addressed by including these specialities as a compulsory rotation in surgery, medicine or family medicine during internship training.
MDRD-eGFR calculated without the African-American correction factor improved GFR prediction in African CKD patients and using the MDRD correction factor of 1.0 in Indian patients as in Caucasians may be inappropriate.
Among the 50 million people with epilepsy (PWE) worldwide, ~15 to 60% also likely suffer from depression and/or anxiety disorders and 80% reside in low-income regions where these comorbidities are often under-recognised and undertreated. We developed a 10-item screening tool for the detection of depression and anxiety disorders for use in Zambian primary care clinics where the baseline detection rate of depression and/or anxiety disorders among PWE is ~1%. Consenting adults (n=595) completed the screening tool and 53.7% screened positive. The screen was validated by a Psychiatric Clinical Officer using DMS-IV criteria. Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.77 overall, and 0.67 and 0.57 for the depression and anxiety components, respectively. Other test characteristics included sensitivity 56.63%, specificity 68.05%, positive predictive value 67.3%, and negative predictive value 57.5%. Interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.85. The psychometric qualities of the tool are inadequate. Development of further, better quality instruments is needed though this will likely require a longer tool which the healthcare workers delivering epilepsy care services have previously deemed non-feasible for routine use. As we work toward development and acceptability of a more optimal instrument, use of this initial screening tool which healthcare workers are willing to use may increase the identification of comorbid depression and anxiety in the low resource setting described in the study.
Conclusion:Neonates developed CRE much earlier than previously reported. Invasive procedures on admission carry an associated higher risk for developing CRE, more than the length of stay as previously stipulated. Prevalence of CRE seems to be high in middle-income countries with higher mortality. Thus, strict infection prevention and control (IPC) measures during admission and during the first weeks of life can decrease the incidence and outcome of CRE-related mortality and morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.