Background: Low back pain has been reported to affect about 84% of adults at different points during their lives. Intervertebral disc degeneration is a common disease of the discs which connect each two adjoining vertebrae as structural damage causes degeneration of the disc and also the surrounding area. Aim of the work: Comparing the effects of shock wave therapy (ESWT) and electromagnetic field on pain severity functional abilities on elderly patients with lumbar disc prolapse (LDP). Subject and method: 48 elderly patients with lumbar disc of both sexes aging from 55 to 75 years contributed in this study. They were randomly assigned to three groups (one control group and two study groups). The control group A received conventional physical therapy only. Study group B received electromagnetic waves plus conventional physical therapy (Moist hot pack, transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS), exercises), study group C received shock wave plus conventional physical therapy. Primary outcome were pain assessment assessed by Visual analogue scale (VAS) and assessment of functional disability assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI), all outcomes measures were assessed for each patient pre and post four weeks of treatment program in the three groups (3 sessions / week). Results: There was no significant difference in all measured variables (VAS and ODI) between group I and III post four weeks of the treatment (p > 0.05). While there was a significant decrease in all measured variables in B in comparison with that of group A post treatment (p < 0.05) and in group B in comparison with that of group C post treatment (p < 0.05) regarding to pain variable only. Conclusions: The results showed that both electromagnetic and shock wave have similar effect on functional disability in patients with lumbar discogenic lesion. While, electromagnetic is more effective to improve pain than shock wave.
Objectives: To assess the impact of cognitive therapy with the rehacom visual-motor module on the hand function in hemiplegic cerebral palsy children.Method: The randomised case-control study was conducted at Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt, from September 2021 to February 2022, and comprised children aged 6-8 years with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. They were randomised into control group A and intervention group B. Subjects in group A received designed physical therapy and hand function training, while those in group B additionally received visual-motor coordination training with the help of rehacom system. The groups were evaluated for both visual-motor coordination and fine motor skills at baseline and after 6-month training. SPSS version 26 was used to analyse the raw data of the current study.Results: Of the 40 subjects, 20(50%) were in each of the two groups. There were 13(65%) boys and 7(35%) girls with mean age 66±4.01 months in group A, and 9(45%) boys and 11(55%) girls with mean age 67±4.06 months in group B (p>0.05). Both groups showed improvement related to grasping, visual-motor integration and fine motor quotient post-intervention, but improvement in group B was significantly higher on each count(p<0.05).Conclusion: The addition of visual-motor integration programme by rehacom system was found to be more effective than the effect of routine physiotherapy training alone.Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Hemiplegia, Motor skills, Muscle spasticity, Psychomotor performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.