Summary
Background Amyloidosis is one of the unusual diseases about which a physician may not think when it is affecting the patient. During the last three decades, there has been an enormous progress in the understanding of the chemical nature, classification, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostic measures and therapy of this disorder.
Aim To provide an updated review of amyloidosis affecting the gastrointestinal tract.
Methods Review of current medical literature.
Results Amyloid proteins (irrespective of the type) can deposit in various parts of the gastrointestinal tract and liver resulting in symptoms of abdominal pain, dysmotility, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatomegaly and even portal hypertension with its associated complications. Definitive diagnosis can only be made by histological examination of the affected organ. Disease modifying treatment with high‐dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem‐cell transplantation has shown promise. Liver transplantation is an option for a select group of patients.
Conclusions Suspicion of gastrointestinal amyloidosis in patients without known history of amyloidosis is difficult, but should be considered in those older than 30 years with unexplained diarrhoea, weight loss, autonomic dysfunction, malabsorption or proteinuria. While most gastrointestinal complications are managed symptomatically, causal therapy is reserved for a select few from various subtypes of this disorder.
Ampullary carcinoid is a rare tumor that can present with gastrointestinal bleeding, obstructive jaundice or pancreatitis. Some of these tumors are associated with Von Recklinghausen disease. The usual surgical options are a biliary-enteric anastomosis, Whipple procedure or rarely a local resection. The mean survival does not appear to be much different after a pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local surgical excision. We report a very rare case of a non-metastatic ampullary carcinoid causing upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which was managed by endoscopic ampullectomy.
SUMMARY
BackgroundOcular complications are amongst many side-effects of interferon based therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Some suggest that diabetic and hypertensive patients are at increased risk of these complications.
AIM:To investigate the proportion of patients with moderate-severe erosive esophagitis (EE) who will have Barrett's esophagus (BE) after healing of inflammation. METHODS: Patients with EE of Los Angeles (LA) class B, C and D who underwent follow-up endoscopy documenting complete mucosal healing. RESULTS: A total of 86/169 patients were suspected of having BE (38 before healing and 48 after healing of EE) and, 46/86 eventually had the histological confirmation. At index esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD), BE was suspected in 38/169 (22%), and ultimately, histologically confirmed in 20 of these. In 11 patients where biopsies were performed in the presence of inflammation, BE was detected in 2 and missed in 5 (including 2 dysplasias). In 131/169 patients (77.5%), BE was not suspected at index EGD. After healing of EE though, 48 patients had suspicion of BE who underwent biopsies, and in 26 of these histology was positive for BE. The length of inflammation had a linear correlation with the length of BE (P = 0.01). Out of multiple variables to predict BE, only the suspicion at index endoscopy was statistically significant (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: B E wa s s e e n i n 4 6 / 1 6 9 ( 2 7 % ) patients with EE of LA class B, C and D. The length of EE can predict the length of underlying BE segment.Even when suspected, BE and associated dysplasia can be missed in the presence of inflammation; therefore, repeat evaluation should be considered after complete healing of esophagitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.