Assessment literacy relates to teacher's ability to know and clearly understand the purpose, measurement, evaluation and use of assessment to report the overall level of student achievement in a particular subject or time period, reflect and take continuous follow-up action to improve instructional, student’s capability and achievement in learning. The purpose of this paper is to use co-citation analysis to detect the evolution of prior research linked to assessment literacy by identify the major sources and the classes they create (i.e. clusters) and reviews the significance of the aspects commonly mentioned by the authors in studies. The Scopus search engine was used to find the papers that were reviewed. All collected data were examined using the VOSviewer software to provide bibliometric results. The review's primary focus is on assessment literacy research that is associated to discussion in educational activities. Finally, the data show that co-occurrence of keywords in documents and co-authorship by author indicate seven and six clusters, respectively. Six primary categories of co-authorship, as follows: (1) Changes to the education assessment system, as well as prospective teacher's trust in its implementation, (2) The requirement for assessment concepts, (3) Literacy and data interpretation from teachers, (4) Assessing literacy and global needs, (5) Factors affecting teacher assessment, and (6) Methods for enhancing teachers' assessment literacy in learning. This paper analysis aims to provide a more thorough knowledge of the evolution of research topics, scientific practice and trends in new and interesting fields of study.

<span lang="EN-US">A teacher classroom assessment literacy (TeCAL) instrument was developed to measure the level of teacher classroom assessment literacy in schools. TeCAL contains 66 multiple choice items with four options based on four constructs namely purpose, measurement, evaluation and use. Thus, this study aims to identify the psychometric properties of TeCAL using Rasch measurement model (RMM) analysis through Winstep software version 3.72.3. The findings show that the compatibility values of mean square (MNSQ) infit and outfit items ranged from 0.64 to 1.46 and 0.40 to 2.23, respectively. The value of MNSQ outfit was outside the set range, but still met the other fit statistics indicator which has a positive point measure correlation (PTMEA) value. In addition, the findings show that the empirical raw variance explained by measures is 38.2%. It was very close to the modeled value of 38.4% with the empirical unexplained variance in 1st contrast being 7.5% less than the maximum controlled 15%. Largest standardized residual correlations identified 10 pairs of dependent items to be less than 0.7. The person and item reliability index values were 0.94 and 0.89 with separation index values of 2.90 and 3.80, respectively. Overall, this psychometric analysis is crucial to ensure that the TeCAL instrument has good quality and meaningful to use.</span>

This study was conducted to identify constructs and subconstructs of teacher classroom assessment literacy instrument. Qualitative document analysis was conducted to identify the constructs and subconstructs used. This document covers previous research articles, modules, and standard documents used in conducting classroom assessments. The qualitative data are analyzed using the literature review system model with four thematic analysis phases. Four main themes or constructs of classroom assessment literacy are derived from the document analysis: Purpose, Measurement, Evaluation, and Use. These four themes are used as the basis for analyzing the Classroom Assessment Standard and Classroom Assessment Implementation Guide from the Ministry of Education Malaysia as the main reference of the study. Besides, four 21st-century assessment features, nine classroom assessment features, and five features of high-order thinking skills items are also included in the analysis as an added value in the constructs and subconstructs. Based on the analysis, three subconstructs for the purpose component, seven for the measurement component, four for the assessment component, and five for the usage component are identified. All these findings are incorporated into the teacher’s assessment literacy instrument.