Comparing one-year outcomes, the CBA is superior to the CB with regards to maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. When using the CBA catheter, an enlarged LA is associated with a higher recurrence of arrhythmia.

Various techniques are used to establish defibrillation efficacy and to evaluate defibrillation safety margins in patients with an ICD. In daily practice a safety margin of 10 J is generally accepted. However, this is based on old clinical data and there are no data on safety margins using current ICD technology with unipolar, active pectoral defibrillators. Therefore, a randomized study was performed to test if the likelihood of successful defibrillation at defibrillation energy requirement (DER) + 5 J and + 10 J is equivalent. Ninety-six patients (86 men; age 61.0 +/- 10.3 years; ejection fraction 0.341 +/- 0.132; coronary artery disease [n = 65], dilated cardiomyopathy [n = 18], other [n = 13]) underwent implantation of an active pectoral ICD system with unidirectional current pathway and a truncated, fixed tilt biphasic shock waveform. The defibrillation energy requirement (DER) was determined with the use of a step-down protocol (delivered energy 15, 10, 8, 6, 4, 3, 2 J). The patients were then randomized to three inductions of ventricular fibrillation at implantation and three at predischarge testing with shock strengths programmed to DER + 5 J at implantation and + 10 J at predischarge testing or vice versa. The mean DER in the total study population was 7.88 +/- 2.96 J. The number of defibrillation attempts was 288 for + 5 J and 288 for + 10 J. The rate of successful defibrillation was 94.1% (DER + 5 J) and 98.9% (DER + 10 J; P < 0.01 for equivalence). Charge times for DER + 5 J were significantly shorter than for DER + 10 J (3.65 +/- 1.14 vs 5.45 +/- 1.47 s; P < 0.001). A defibrillation safety margin of DER + 5 J is associated with a defibrillation probability equal to the standard DER + 10 J. In patients in whom short charge times are critical for avoidance of syncope, a safety margin of DER + 5 J seems clinically safe for programming of the first shock energy.

About 25 s after freeze initiation, the temperature-time slope predicts important key characteristics of a cryoablation, such as nadir temperature. The slope is the only reported predictor to actually precede acute isolation and thus to support decisions about pull-down manoeuvres or aborting a cryoablation early on. It is also predictive of very low nadir temperatures and phrenic nerve palsy and thus may add to patient safety.

Dietary modification and supplementation play an increasingly important role in the conservative treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current interest has focused on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and vitamin D. Clinical trial results on this subject are contradictory in many aspects. Several studies indicate that n-3 PUFA consumption improves vascular and cardiac hemodynamics, triglycerides, and possibly endothelial function, autonomic control, inflammation, thrombosis, and arrhythmia. Experimental studies show effects on membrane structure and associated functions, ion channel properties, genetic regulation, and production of anti-inflammatory mediators. Clinical trials evaluating a possible reduction in cardiovascular disease by n-3 PUFA have shown different results. Supplementation of vitamin D is common regarding prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. But vitamin D also seems to have several effects on the cardiovascular system. Vitamin D deficiency appears to be related to an increase in parathyroid hormone levels and can predispose to essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, increased insulin resistance, and eventually to atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular events. Randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D and omega-3 FA supplementation therapy should be recommended as a routine therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been introduced as a treatment for selected heart failure patients, specifically those with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and intraventricular conduction delays. CRT is delivered by use of an implanted device and leads positioned in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle. In the early stages of CRT development, researchers affixed epicardial electrodes to the left ventricle by means of subxiphoid, thoracoscopic, or major surgical procedure. Currently there are a number of transvenous LV leads available that have undergone substantial evaluation. Reports indicate that such leads can be positioned safely by cannulating the coronary sinus and inserting the lead into the venous system. The leads are reported to have acceptable pacing/sensing thresholds and complication rates. Because of individual variations in the cardiac and venous anatomy, as well as sharp angulations in the venous system, maneuverability is an important consideration in lead selection.