Purpose The purpose of this paper is to improve surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) prescribing in orthopaedic surgery using the model for improvement framework. Design/methodology/approach Orthopaedic patients receiving joint replacements, hip fracture repairs or open-reduction internal-fixation procedures were included. Antimicrobial(s); dose, time of administration and duration of SAP were evaluated for appropriateness based on the local SAP guidelines. After baseline data collection, a driver diagram was constructed with interventions devised for plan-do-study-act cycles. Data were fed back weekly using a point prevalence design (PPD). Interventions included SAP guideline changes, reminders and tools to support key messages. Findings SAP in 168 orthopaedic surgeries from 15 June 2016 to 31 January 2017 was studied. Prescribing appropriateness improved from 20 to 78 per cent. Junior doctor changeover necessitated additional education and reminders. Practical implications Due to constant staff changeover; continuous data collection, communication, education and reminders are essential to ensure continuous compliance with clinical guidance. Patients with hip fractures are difficult to weigh, requiring weight estimation for weight-based antimicrobial dosing. Unintended consequences of interventions included the necessity to change pre-operative workflow to accommodate reconstitution time of additional antimicrobials and inadvertent continuation of new antimicrobials post-operatively. Originality/value Rather than perform the traditional retrospective focused audit, we established a prospective, continuous, interventional quality improvement (QI) project focusing on internal processes within the control of the project team with rapid cyclical changes and interventions. The weekly PPD was pragmatic and enabled the QI project to be sustained with no additional resources.

Background In line with the National Frailty Programme1, patients over the age of 75 admitted to hospital should have a comprehensive geriatric assessment including the assessment of current continence status and any history of incontinence. Up to 39% of adults are reported to develop new onset urinary incontinence during admission to hospital2,3, however studies show that is it a problem not always identified by staff members,4. In response to these observations within an acute teaching hospital, a continence working party was formed involving members of nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy colleagues to explore the current practice and culture relating to continence management. Methods The group established key objectives which were broken into four strands; 1. Audit of documentation of baseline continence on admission (therapy and nursing). 2. Obtaining access to additional types of continence wear. 3. Staff education. 4. Pre and post education survey. Results 1. Audit of documentation demonstrated poor standards of documentation of baseline continence. This led to an amendment to questioning prompts on therapy initial assessment forms and a plan to further evaluate the nursing documentation. 2. A wider array of continence wear has been made available on the wards providing greater options for patients. 3. Staff education session was compiled by a specialist physiotherapist and is widely available for staff to access on the hospitals online training portal. 4. Pre-education surveys have been completed with a view to re-administering following education roll-out. Conclusion The aim of this multidisciplinary working group is to equip staff with the correct resources, knowledge, and confidence to ensure best practice promotion of continence on the targeted wards. This project is the first strand of a wider culture changed that is needed around continence promotion for older adults in the acute setting.

No abstract