The shape of the kinetic curve for gadobutrol is reportedly different compared with that for other conventional contrast agents. We speculate that the shape of gadobutrol kinetic curve may be influenced by different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols and evaluation methods. The purpose of our study was to assess the influence between gadobutrol and other conventional contrast agent (gadodiamide hydrate) on the kinetic curve in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We assessed 139 women of IDC in this study. Gadodiamide hydrate (2 ml/s) was administered to 69 women, and gadobutrol (1 ml/s) was administrated to 70 women, both contrast agents at 0.1 mmol/kg BW. When the kinetic curves of contrast agents were evaluated between by Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4th edition and BI-RADS 5th edition, suggested that the analysis method of BI-RADS may affect. Patient group who were administered gadobutrol demonstrated a lower washout rate when compared with patient group who were administered gadodiamide hydrate administration (P<0.01). These results suggest that the kinetic curve characteristics of gadobutrol are an important consideration in diagnosis. Therefore, it is necessary to perform image diagnosis by considering the influence of the contrast agent and the analysis method, when image diagnostic doctor perform image diagnosis.

This study aimed to investigate the protective effect of oral steroid premedication in terms of adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. We investigated the incidence of adverse reactions among patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Patients in the premedication group took 30 mg of prednisolone orally the night before and on the morning of the scheduled computed tomography. Sixty-five patients received the same contrast media. Among them, 56 took prednisolone orally prior to the procedure (premedication without change of contrast media group) and nine without premedication (no premedication and no change of contrast media group). In total, 379 patients received different contrast media. Among them, 340 took prednisolone orally (premedication with change of contrast media group), while 39 did not take the premedication (no premedication with change of contrast media group). The adverse reaction rates in the premedication with change of contrast media and no premedication with change of contrast media groups were 1.8% (6/340 cases) and 2.6% (1/39 cases) (P = 0.54), respectively. The incidence of adverse reaction after the administration of non-ionic iodinated contrast media did not differ significantly based on whether an oral steroid was administered prior to compute tomography. Our evaluation is limited due to the small sample size of the contrast media-changed group. However, even if premedication with steroids is effective, it may only result in an adverse reaction reduction rate of ≤3%.

No abstract

Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is performed to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions by evaluating the changes in signal intensity of the acquired image (kinetic curve). This study aimed to verify whether the existing breast DCE‐MRI analyzed by the sigmoid model can accurately distinguish between benign and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and predict the subtype. A total of 154 patients who underwent breast MRI for detailed breast mass examinations were included in this study (38 with benign masses and 116 with IDC. The sigmoid model involved the acquisition of images at seven timepoints in 1‐min intervals to determine the change in signal intensity before and after contrast injection. From this curve, the magnitude of the increase in signal intensity in the early phase, the time to reach the maximum increase, and the slopes in the early and late phases were calculated. The Mann–Whitney U‐test was used for the statistical analysis. The IDC group exhibited a significantly larger and faster signal increase in the early phase and a significantly smaller rate of increase in the late phase than the benign group (P < 0.001). The luminal A‐like group demonstrated a significantly longer time to reach the maximum signal increase rate than other IDC subtypes (P < 0.05). The sigmoid model analysis of breast DCE‐MRI can distinguish between benign lesions and IDC and may also help in predicting luminal A‐like breast cancer.