In this study we focused on the structure and expression of the HLA-E, F, and G class I complexes in placental tissue. Structural analysis included an examination of the peptides bound to soluble and membrane forms of the HLA-G complex isolated directly from placenta. An important distinction was observed from HLA-G bound peptides previously isolated from transfectant cells. Thus, the number of distinct moieties bound to placental-derived proteins was substantially lower than that bound to transfectant-derived HLA-G. Indeed, a single peptide species derived from a cytokine-related protein alone accounted for 15% of the molar ratio of HLA-G bound peptide. To further examine HLA-E and its potential to bind peptide, notably that derived from HLA-G, we combined new Abs to examine expression in placental tissues for all the known forms of the nonclassical class I molecules. Whereas membrane HLA-G was found in extravillous trophoblasts, soluble HLA-G was found in all placental trophoblasts, including villous cytotrophoblasts and syncitiotrophoblasts. Further, HLA-E was found in all cells that expressed either form of HLA-G, consistent with HLA-E being complexed with the HLA-G signal sequence-derived nonamer in these cells. Finally, using new reagents specific for HLA-F, a restricted pattern of expression was observed, primarily on extravillous trophoblasts that had invaded the maternal decidua. Comparative staining indicated that HLA-F was on the surface of these cells, defining them as the first to demonstrate surface expression of this Ag and the first cell type identified to express all three nonclassical HLA class I Ags simultaneously.

A set of robust PCR-SSP reactions were developed for each of the five polymorphic sites that define the five alleles of the HLA class Ib gene, HLA-E. This method was developed using 28 homozygous cell lines and further tested in a sample of African-Americans, a sample of Japanese, and a core panel of cell lines compiled for the 13th International Histocompatibility Workshop. Three alleles were found in each of these four sample groups, HLA-E*0101 (64.29, 50.00, 32.00 and 56.58%, respectively), *01031 (5.36, 20.65, 39.00 and 18.42%) and *01032 (30.35, 29.35, 29.00, and 25.00%). HLA-E*0102 was not detected in any of these samples nor in the cell line, LCL 722.221, in which this allele was originally described. HLA-E*0104 was not found either. This latter allele was originally reported in Japanese at a frequency of 1/22 (4.5%), which should have been high enough to have resulted in multiple occurrences of the *0104 allele in the samples tested in this study. We propose that the existence of the HLA-E*0102 and E*0104 alleles should be questioned.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract