BackgroundExclusive breastfeeding has been endorsed as the healthiest feeding choice for newborns. This study aims to assess impact of expecting mothers’ knowledge and attitude toward intention to breastfeed exclusively. Utilizing mobile health (mHealth) as educational tool can offer a widely distributed and affordable platform to promote exclusive breastfeeding.Research aims and questionsThis study aims to assess impact of expecting mothers’ knowledge, attitude and beliefs on decision to breastfeed exclusively. Furthermore, it purposes mobile health (mHealth) as educational tool offering a widely distributed, affordable and accessible platform to promote exclusive breastfeeding.MethodsThe study was conducted in prenatal clinics’ waiting areas to interview expecting mothers utilizing a translated version of Infant Feeding Practices Survey II (IFPS II, CDC). After completing the survey, an educational video was shown utilizing a tablet and the question was re-asked about intention toward breastfeeding exclusively.ResultsMost expecting mothers indicated having some awareness about breastfeeding (67%) but only 46.1% intended to initiate exclusive breastfeeding early in life prior to the intervention. Moreover, only 53.7% believed breastfeeding is the best nutritional choice. Actually, 39.5% of participants considered breastfeeding equal to formula. Most working mothers complained of lack of workplace support to breastfeed. Also, they were not comfortable breastfeeding in front of others except spouse. Additionally, most participants found nurses and media as poor information resources. Resources utilizing social media and Internet were found useful. After watching the educational video, the majority expressed positive intention to breastfeed exclusively (80.8%). Positive intentions were associated with advance maternal age, prior breastfeeding knowledge and willingness to hear experts’ opinions.ConclusionSaudi women have limited knowledge about exclusive breastfeeding and early initiation. They feel unprepared, unsupported, lack resources and socially challenged. An educational material utilizing mHealth can alter intentions to breastfeed exclusively.

BackgroundPatients with diabetic foot ulcers may have a lower quality of life. The objective was to compare the quality of life and its psychosocial determinants among patients with and without diabetic foot ulcers.MethodsA case-control study was conducted in 2017 among patients with (cases) and without (controls) diabetic foot ulcers. The study tools included the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life scale (WHOQOL-BREF), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale for anxiety and depression, the Patient Health Questionnaire Physical Symptoms (PHQ-15) for the severity of somatic symptoms, and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure for self-management.ResultsA total of 209 patients (45 cases and 164 controls) were included. The average age was 56.2 ± 11.7 years, and 55.5% were female. The average scores of WHOQOL-BREF, PHQ-15, and SDSCA were 74.4% ± 12.1% and 8.1 ± 6.1, and 30.4 ± 21.8, respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression were 19.6 and 24.9%, respectively. SDSCA was the only psychosocial determinants higher in cases than controls (mean difference = 15.0, 95% CI = -8.0–22.0). The correlation coefficients of WHOQOL-BREF scores with anxiety, depression, and PHQ-15 scores in all patients were − 0.559 (p < 0.001), − 0.582 (p < 0.001), and − 0.532 (p < 0.001), respectively, with similar numbers in both groups. In multivariate analysis, only the association between quality of life and depression was maintained.ConclusionQuality of life and psychosocial determinants with the exception of self-management were not associated with diabetic foot ulcers. Depressive symptoms were independent determinant of poor quality of life, irrespective of the status of diabetic foot ulcers.

BackgroundOsteoporosis is a disease of bone density. It makes bones fragile and easy to break. Fragility fractures can cause significant morbidity, mortality, poor quality of life, and financial stress on medical care. Osteoporosis is overlooked and undertreated. Saudi Arabia issued a national plan promoting the early diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Few and old studies are available in Saudi Arabia estimating the prevalence of osteoporosis in the Saudi older adult population. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia among older adult patients. MethodologyThis retrospective cross-sectional study is based on data gathered from patients ≥60 years of age. Data were collected from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, for patients who were attending family medicine clinics at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who were screened using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Patients who have secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. ResultsA total of 1,302 patients were studied during the course of data collection. The mean age was 68.26. Out of the studied subjects, 75% were female and 25% were males. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 8.2% and 11.8% in femoral and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) results, respectively. The prevalence of osteopenia based on femoral and lumbar BMD results was 50.2% and 41.2%, respectively. ConclusionOsteoporosis and osteopenia are prevalent in the Saudi older adult population. Multiple clinical characteristics have been associated with low bone density disease. Thus, it is important to reinforce primary care physicians' efforts for early screening and treatment of the Saudi older adult population based on their clinical and demographic risk factors.

Aim: Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of permanent visual loss affecting significant numbers in Saudi Arabia. There is no cure for glaucoma but there is mounting evidence to guide ophthalmologists in diagnosing and managing this disease. The aim of this pilot project was to assess the compliance with evidence-based criteria and to implement an adapted clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of patients with POAG at a tertiary eye care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia that will lead to improving quality, consistency and optimizing patients’ care. Methods: The project consisted of three phases using audit and feedback strategy. It has utilized the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool. Eleven evidence-based audit criteria were developed. A baseline audit was then conducted. Barriers behind areas of noncompliance were identified and a number of strategies were implemented to overcome them. A follow-up postimplementation audit was then conducted. Results: Twenty electronic medical files were randomly selected for baseline audit. The results of the audit have identified a number of possible areas to improve in the diagnosis and management of POAG in compliance with the adapted CPG with compliance rate as low as 20% (4/20) in some criteria. Multifaceted interventions were implemented targeting mainly attitude and lack of knowledge and time and resource barriers. Significant improvement occurred in most criteria audited postimplementation. Conclusion: The project demonstrates that audit and feedback is a feasible and effective tool to change glaucoma practice in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. The success was due to multifaceted interventions including clear communication to promote awareness, an easily accessible CPG, and regular reminders to improve knowledge and change behavior. We propose our pilot implementation to be generalized to promote implementing evidence-based ophthalmology.