Objective-To determine if insulin resistance is present in normotensive adults at increased risk ofdeveloping hypertension.Design-Normotensive subjects with at least one hypertensive parent were paired with offspring of normotensive parents (controls), being matched for age, sex, social class, and physical activity.Setting-Outpatient clinic. Subjects-30 paired subjects (16 men and 14 women) with and without a family history of hypertension, aged 18-32, with a body mass index < 25 kg/mi, with blood pressure < 130/85 mm Hg, and not taking drugs.Interventions-Euglycaemic glucose clamp (two hour infusion of insulin 1 mU/kg/min) and intravenous glucose tolerance test (injection of 100 ml 20% glucose).Main outcome measures-Insulin mediated glucose disposal and insulin secretion.Results-The offspring of hypertensive parents had slightly higher blood pressure than did the controls (mean 117 (SD 6) v 108 (5) mm Hg systolic, p=0013; 76 (7) v 67 (6) mm Hg diastolic, p=0.017). Their insulin mediated glucose disposal was lower than that of controls (29.5 (6 5) v 40-1 (8.6) [imol/kg/min, p=0.002), but, after adjustment for blood pressure, the difference was not significant (difference 6-9 (95% confidence interval -1 5 to 15.3), p=010). Insulin secretion in the first hour after injection of glucose was slightly but not significantly higher in the offspring of hypertensive patients (9320 (5484) Conclusions-Young normotensive subjects who are at increased risk of developing hypertension are insulin resistant.
It has been suggested that increased glucose/glucose 6-phosphate substrate cycling impairs net hepatic glucose uptake in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and contributes to hyperglycaemia. To investigate glucose/glucose 6-phosphate cycle activity and insulin action in Type 2 diabetes we studied eight patients and eight healthy control subjects, using the euglycaemic glucose clamp and isotope dilution techniques with purified [2-3H]- and [6-3H] glucose tracers, in the post-absorptive state and eight patients and five healthy control subjects during consecutive insulin infusions at rates of 0.4 and 2.0 mU.kg-1 x min-1. [2-3H]glucose and [6-3H]glucose radioactivity in plasma samples were determined using selective enzymatic detritiation, allowing calculation of glucose turnover rates for each isotope, the difference being glucose/glucose 6-phosphate cycling. Endogenous glucose production ([6-3H]glucose) was greater in diabetic than control subjects in the post-absorptive state (15.6 +/- 1.5 vs 11.3 +/- 0.4 mumol.kg-1 x min-1, p < 0.05) and during the 0.4 mU insulin infusion (10.1 +/- 1.3 vs 5.2 +/- 0.3 mumol.kg-1 x min-1, p < 0.01) indicating hepatic insulin resistance. Glucose/glucose 6-phosphate cycling was significantly greater in diabetic than in control subjects in the post-absorptive state (2.6 +/- 0.4 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2 mumol.kg-1 x min-1, p < 0.05) but not during the 0.4 mU insulin infusion (2.0 +/- 0.4 vs 2.0 +/- 0.3 mumol.kg-1 x min-1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The debate continues on how to screen for microalbuminuria in clinical practice in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Our study assesses the value of a spot morning urine specimen obtained at a clinic visit. In 1984, as part of a randomised survey of our diabetes clinic, 43 of 249 patients with insulin treated diabetes mellitus, were found to have microalbuminuria (urinary albumin concentration 35-300 ug ml-1) on a spot morning urine sample. These subjects were compared with an age-matched control group from the 1984 cohort who did not have microalbuminuria. Eight years later, in the group with microalbuminuria, 10 had died compared to six in the control group (p = 0.17) with 62.5% of all deaths being from cardiovascular disease. In the group with microalbuminuria, 10 of 27 still had incipient nephropathy while five had progressed to nephropathy. In the group without microalbuminuria only three of 33 patients had progressed to microalbuminuria while none had progressed to nephropathy. In conclusion a spot morning urine sample is a useful screening test to identify patients at risk of progression to nephropathy.
This study followed up a cohort of patients with microalbuminuria identified on a spot morning urine sample 8 years earlier and aimed to determine if a spot morning urinary albumin concentration was able to identify patients with non-insulin treated diabetes at increased risk of mortality and progression to nephropathy. In 1984, 47 of 216 patients chosen by random selection from our teaching hospital-based diabetes clinic were identified as having microalbuminuria (urinary albumin concentration 35-300 micrograms ml-1). Subjects were compared with an age-matched control group from the 1984 cohort who did not have microalbuminuria. Eight years later, 22 of 47 (46.8%) patients with microalbuminuria had died compared to 10 of 47 (21.3%) patients without albuminuria (p < 0.05). The majority of deaths were from cardiovascular disease (53.1%). Logistic regression showed microalbuminuria to be an independent predictor of mortality, not influenced by age, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, glycosylated haemoglobin or creatinine at the initial examination. Eight years later, in the group with initial microalbuminuria, eight still had microalbuminuria and five patients had developed nephropathy. In the group without albuminuria in 1984, only one patient had progressed to microalbuminuria and no patients to nephropathy. In conclusion, a spot urinary albumin concentration is of value in identifying patients with an increased risk of mortality or progression to nephropathy, and is simple to obtain at a clinic.
In this study, three of nine patients with an apparently benign diploid cytometric pattern subsequently developed recurrent disease. Routine use of DNA flow cytometry did not reliably differentiate benign from malignant phaeochromocytoma. Prolonged clinical and biochemical follow-up is still necessary for all patients with this condition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.