Aim: to evaluate the early results of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD for large benign colon neo-plasms.   Patients and methods: a prospective non-randomized comparative study included 100 patients with large benignepithelial colon neoplasms (more than 3 cm in diameter). The main group included 50 patients who underwentendoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection. The control group included 50 patients who underwent traditional endo-scopic submucosal dissection (ESD).   Results: Four (4 %) patients (1 in the main and 3 in the control group) were excluded from the study due to theconversion of endoscopic procedure. The incidence en bloc removal of neoplasms and the negative resection margins were significantly higher in the main group than in the control one — 98 % and 87.2 % (p = 0.04) and 89.8 % and 70.2 %, respectively (p = 0.01).   Conclusion: ESTD for large benign epithelial colon neoplasms shows better radicalness in comparison with endo-scopic submucosal dissection.

Aim: to identify the risk factors for conversion of endoscopic submucosal dissection to abdominal surgery.Patients and methods: the prospective cohort study included 405 patients: 166 (40.9%) males and 239 (59.1%) females. The median age was 66 (59; 72) years old; the patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal epithelial neoplasms.Results: the median size of the removed neoplasms was 3.0 (2.4; 4) cm, tumor was removed en bloc in 324/363 (89.2%) cases; and R0 resection margins were detected in 218/324 (67.3%) cases. Significant risk factors for conversion were: the tumor size ≥ 3.2 cm (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–7.1, p = 0.017), lifting ≤ 3 mm (OR 41, 95% CI 15–105, p = 0.000002) and the tumor vascular pattern IIIa according Sano’s capillary pattern classification (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3–11.9, p = 0.013).Conclusion: endoscopic submucosal dissection is a safe way to remove colorectal neoplasms. However, the presence of conversion risk factors can influence the outcome of endoscopic treatment.

Endoscopic removal of giant adenomas of the cecum is associated with high risk of perforation and conversion to laparoscopic procedure. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for cecal adenomas had technical limitations due to the adjacent ileocecal valve and appendix opening, perpendicular operating angle. Case presentation of the possibility of successful removal of a large laterally spreading cecal adenoma by the method of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) never been described before for this tumor site and size. Patient 54 years old, an LST-G adenoma (5 cm in diameter, according to Kudo – IIIL, according to Sano – II) was detected in the dome of the cecum during colonoscopy. ESTD. The postoperative period without any unfavorable events; the patient was discharged on the 5th day after surgery. The morphological conclusion: tubulo-villous adenoma with moderate epithelial dysplasia, R0. ESTD is suitable for cecal giant adenomas.

No abstract