Acute graft rejection remains a major problem in renal transplant recipients, and there is no consensus on the optimal immunosuppressive strategy.
Immunoprophylaxis with ThymoglobulinA or basiliximab has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes and graft loss following kidney transplantation. This open, randomized, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab (20 mg day 0-day 4) plus early cyclosporine from day 0 (n Ω 50) compared with Thymoglobulin A plus delayed cyclosporine (n Ω 50) in adult kidney transplant patients. In addition, all patients received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at standard doses from day 0. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 98 and 94% in the basiliximab group, respectively, compared with 100 and 96% in the Thymoglobulin A group. The incidences of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (8.0% in each group) and treatment failure (14% in the basiliximab group vs. 8% in the Thymoglobulin group) were comparable in the two groups. There was a nonsignificant tendency to more dialysis (14 vs. 6%), and fewer cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (p Ω0.005) in the basiliximab group, but the percentage of clinical CMV was not different between the two groups (6 vs. 12%). Both strategies give excellent results, despite the differences in patterns, in nonhyperimmunized patients receiving their first cadaveric renal allograft.
Long-term treatment with canakinumab achieves a highly relevant improvement in the physical, emotional, and social lives of patients with CAPS, accompanied by a marked reduction in support required from caregivers and in health care consultations.
This study confirmed that the Rome II criteria detected IBS with a prevalence of 4.7%. The recruited subjects had severe symptoms (frequency, intensity and duration) that had a considerable effect on their daily life. The high level of referrals and initial consultations in all categories and the patient's attitudes towards the illness and its treatment emphasize the relative ineffectiveness of care for patients suffering from IBS.
Summary:Cyclosporin A (CsA) absorption is variable in bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients compromising the efficacy of graft-versus-host disease prevention. Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA which has an improved bioavailibility, increases intestinal absorption of the drug with less variable pharmacokinetic parameters in non-BMT patients. In order to predict the best dosage of Neoral when patients are switched from i.v. to oral administration we performed a randomised study comparing two oral doses, either the same or twice the last i.v. dose used after BMT. Fourteen adults were randomised around day 25 after BMT. Whole blood CSA concentrations were measured 2 and 12 h after the oral administration of Neoral on days 0, 7 and 14 to determine residual and maximum concentration, and modified whenever necessary to maintain blood level CsA concentration within therapeutic range (150-250 ng/ml). We found that patients who received twice the last i.v. dose had better concentrations than patients from the other group while toxicity was identical in both groups. We conclude that doubling the last i.v. dose during the switch to oral administration of Neoral gives the best therapeutic range concentration and should be recommended for graft-versus-host prevention. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 965-968. Keywords: bone marrow transplantation; cyclosporin A; pharmacokineticsIn an attempt to improve the bioavailibility of oral cyclosporin A (CsA) and to reduce variability in absorption, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA has been developed (Neoral).Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in healthy volunteers and renal, liver and cardiac transplant recipients have consistently demonstrated that absorption was increased by an average of 30% in the area-under-the-curve and was faster after Neoral than after Sandimmun. This results in an increased bioavailibility, a lower dependency on food, bile or pancreatic enzymes and a markedly reduced variability
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.