BackgroundTo date, the choice of optimal anesthetic management during endovascular therapy (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke patients remains subject to debate. We aimed to compare functional outcomes and complication rates of EVT according to the first-line anesthetic management in two comprehensive stroke centers: local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA).MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected databases, identifying all consecutive EVT for strokes in the anterior circulation performed between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 in two EVT-capable stroke centers. One center performed EVT under LA in the first intention, while the other center systematically used GA. Using propensity score analysis, the two groups underwent 1:1 matching, then procedural metrics, complications, and clinical outcomes were compared. Good outcome was defined as 90 days modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2, and successful recanalization as modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3.ResultsDuring the study period, 219 patients were treated in the LA center and 142 in the GA center. Using the propensity score, 97 patients from each center were matched 1:1 according to the baseline characteristics. Local anesthesia was associated with a significantly lower proportion of good outcome (36.1% vs 52.0%, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.87; p=0.039), lower rate of successful recanalization (70.1% vs 95.8%, OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.39; p<0.001), and more procedural complications (14.4% vs 3.0%, OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.09 to 14.28; p=0.018). There were no significant differences in 90-day mortality or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rates.ConclusionsIn this study, systematic use of GA for stroke EVT was associated with better clinical outcomes, higher recanalization rates, and fewer procedural complications compared with patients treated under LA as the primary anesthetic approach.
BackgroundWe report the first case series of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous cyanoacrylate injection targeting the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for all consecutive cases of SIH patients with CSF leak confirmed on CT myelography, treated by CT-guided percutaneous cyanoacrylate injection at our institution from 2016 to 2022. On pretreatment brain and spine MRIs, we analyzed signs of SIH according to the Bern score, and dichotomized cases into positive/negative for spinal longitudinal extradural CSF collection (SLEC-P or SLEC-N). The leaks detected on CT myelography were classified into three types according to Schievinket al. We collected the Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6) scores throughout a 6-month follow-up, with a brain CT scan at each visit.Results11 patients were included (mean age 48.4 years, six men). Five SLEC-P type 1, three SLEC-P type 2, and three SLEC-N type 3 leaks were identified. All patients had significant signs of SIH on pretreatment brain MRI (mean Bern score 7.8±1.1). Six patients underwent a foraminal puncture, and five patients had a cervical epidural approach. Two patients experienced mild and transient locoregional pain after cervical epidural injection. Mean HIT-6 score at baseline was 66.8±3.2 and at the 6-month follow-up was 38±3.6 (P<0.001). All patients achieved improvement in their symptoms, with 82% of them (9/11) having complete resolution of headaches and SIH findings on CT scans at 6 months. No clinical worsening or recurrence was observed.ConclusionsCT-guided percutaneous cyanoacrylate injection may be a potential therapeutic option for the different types of CSF leak causing SIH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.