Objective: Young adults often encounter sleep deprivation and stressful events. Both have been separately reported to modulate immunity, and occasionally they occur simultaneously. We assessed the combined effects of these conditions on immune competence in healthy students. Methods: Twenty-three participants (mean age 24 years; SD 1.86; 14 females) were exposed to 30 h of sleep deprivation during which they conducted physiological, social and cognitive tasks. The control group consisted of 18 participants (mean age 23.67 years; SD 1.46; 11 females). All participants underwent cognitive and psychological evaluations at 10:00 AM, followed by blood and saliva collection, 3 days before sleep deprivation induction and on the morning following it. Immune/endocrine measures included blood counts of lymphocytes, granulocytes, monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells; levels of several cell surface markers; NK cytotoxicity; plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, dehydroepiandrosterone and neuropeptide Y, and plasma and salivary cortisol levels. Results: Although the experimental protocol significantly elevated state anxiety and psychological dissociation levels, no effects were evident in any of the immunological/endocrine indices. In contrast, expected sex differences in immune measures were found, including significantly higher NK cytotoxicity and monocyte counts in males, validating the integrity of the measurements. Conclusions: The findings suggest resilience of the immune system to a combined sleep deprivation and stressful exposure in young adults, while previous studies reported immune perturbations following either of these conditions separately. These apparent contradictions might reflect differences in the study design or in the methodology used for immunological assessments, including the time of sample collection, the combination of sleep deprivation with stress and our in vivo assessment of cytokine levels.

Perioperative administration of propranolol and etodolac seems safe in colon operations in rats and does not affect anastomotic failure or colon healing.

Abstract. Objective: COX inhibitors and b-adrenergic blockers were recently shown to reduce cancer progression in animal models through various mechanisms. These include the prevention of immune suppression during the critical perioperative period, and the preclusion of direct promoting effects of catecholamines and prostaglandins on malignant tissue growth. To assess the safety of such pharmacological treatments in the context of oncologic surgery, the current study evaluates wound healing efficacy in the skin, muscle, and colon tissues in rats undergoing colonic anastomosis. Methods: F344 rats were treated daily with a COX-2 inhibitor (etodolac), a b-adrenergic blocker (propranolol), both drugs or vehicles. All rats underwent skin punch biopsy, and half were also subjected to laparotomy and colonic anastomosis. Tensile strength of the abdominal wall and colonic bursting pressure were assessed on Days 3, 7, and 30 postoperatively, and skin biopsy site healing was scored on Days 2, 4, and 6 postoperatively. Results: None of the drug treatments produced any deleterious effects along the expected course of tissue healing. On Day 30, colon bursting pressure showed an abnormal strengthening in animals undergoing anastomosis compared to non-operated animals, across all drug treatments. This abnormal strengthening was attenuated by etodolac. In the skin, surgery reduced healing rate, irrespective of drug treatments. Conclusions: Effective doses of etodolac and propranolol caused no negative effects on wound healing processes in rats. The apparent safety of such treatments, together with their potential clinical benefits, suggests the incorporation of these treatments in oncologic patients undergoing curative tumor resection.

No abstract