The objective of the NEKST (Nutrition Environmental Kibbutzim Study), a nonrandomized interventional study, was to evaluate the effect of an integrated intervention program on participants’ lunch quality and diversity in two communal dining rooms (intervention n = 58 vs. control n = 54). The intervention included recipe modification, environmental changes, and an education program. The outcomes included simple healthy meal index (SHMI), lunch quality (LQS), and diversity scores (LDS) calculated based on photographs of lunch trays. A nutrition questionnaire assessed the changes in fruit and vegetable intake at baseline and 3 months following the intervention. The mean SHMI, LQS, and LDS increased in the intervention group (0.51, p < 0.001; 0.27, p = 0.045; 0.95, p < 0.001, respectively) but not in the control group (p = 0.865; p = 0.339; p = 0.354, respectively). Multivariable linear models demonstrate an increase in the SHMI (β = 0.26, 95% CI [0.12–0.76], p = 0.015), LQS (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.06–0.83], p = 0.024), and LDS (β = 0.34, 95% CI [0.41–1.39], p < 0.001) of the participants in the intervention group. More participants in the intervention group raised their daily fruit intake compared with the control. We conclude that this integrated intervention program was effective in improving lunch healthy meal index, quality, and diversity in a communal dining room, with a modest halo effect of the intervention throughout the day.

Eating in catering systems has been identified as a driver of poor diet quality. Interventions within catering systems increase the nutrient density of dishes. Little is known about the incremental costs associated with this strategy. One part of the NEKST (Nutrition Environmental Kibbutzim Study) intervention was nutritional improvement of recipes (decreasing the amount of energy, sodium, and saturated fat). We evaluated the nutritional content of dishes per 100 g and the incremental costs associated with these changes from the catering system’s perspective, as well as diners’ satisfaction with the catering system before and after the intervention. Our results revealed that as energy and saturated fat decreased, the associated incremental cost increased (rs = −0.593, p = 0.010 and rs = −0.748, p <0.001, respectively). However, the decrease in sodium was not associated with increased costs (rs = 0.099, p = 0.696). While diners’ satisfaction decreased in the control group, it did not change in the intervention group following the intervention (p = 0.018). We concluded that recipe modification improved the nutritional value of dishes without increasing cost. This intervention was not associated with decreased diner satisfaction. This evidence encourages the implementation of policies to improve the nutritional quality of food served by caterers without jeopardizing sales and with the potential to improve public health.

Improving nutrition improves health outcomes. Eating in a catering system may provide an environment for promoting healthy dietary choices. To map the factors that shape the food choices of diners who routinely eat in catering systems, we collected and analyzed qualitative data about diners’ perceptions of their food choices in communal dining rooms in three kibbutzim in Israel. From May to July 2014, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 13 diners who ate at least three lunches per week in the kibbutz’s dining room. Data analysis followed thematic analysis principles. Two categories of themes emerged from the interviews. In the personal context category, the themes identified were eating as a task and attempts to control one’s eating. In the contextual aspects of eating in the catering system category, themes identified were eating in the dining room as a default, the characteristics of the food served, routine, and personal versus public aspects. The sub-theme of the diners’ freedom of choice emerged in the two categories of themes. Diners’ wishes of maintaining their freedom of choice may be an important contribution to the debate of whether catering systems should provide only healthy foods, which may jeopardize diners’ freedom of choice.