Background
Currently, it is not known how the combined osseous and ligamentous injury of a traumatic elbow dislocation in a National Football League (NFL) athlete affects management and return to play. In this study, we aimed to describe the epidemiology, management, and return to play for elbow dislocations in NFL athletes.
Methodology
This is a descriptive observational study. A retrospective review of all elbow dislocations between 2000 and 2014 (15 seasons) was performed using the NFL Injury Surveillance System (NFLISS).
Results
Over 15 NFL seasons, 82 elbow dislocations were recorded in the NFLISS. Among players who reported surgery (n = 5), players missed an average of 73.8 days of play. Among those who did not report surgery, players missed an average of 36.1 days. The overall incidence was 0.26 dislocation events per 10,000 athlete exposures. The majority of these injuries occurred during regular-season games, in defensive linebackers and linemen, during tackling contact with another player, and most commonly on a running play.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that an elbow dislocation is not a career-ending or season-ending injury in an NFL cohort. Information regarding incidence, positions affected, whether surgical management is utilized, and return to play will help players who sustain and physicians who treat these injuries in elite football athletes understand the impact of their injuries.
The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) published Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) in 2014 to aid physicians in the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. AUC should be evaluated in real practice, and if necessary modified based on identified problems. This study compares AAOS AUC recommendations with actual treatment performed in a cohort of patients treated for type III supracondylar humerus fractures. Medical record review of patients treated for type III supracondylar humerus fractures at our hospital from 2009 to 2016. Criteria required by the AAOS AUC were collected and entered into the AAOS AUC web-based application to determine the ‘appropriateness’ and score of each treatment. These were compared with the actual treatment the patient received. Over the study period, 585 patients (mean age: 6.5 years, 51% male, 49% female) were treated for type III supracondylar humerus fractures. Of the 585 cases, 561 (95.9%) were classified as ‘appropriate’, 24 (4.1%) as ‘maybe appropriate’, and 0 (0%) as ‘rarely appropriate’. Of the ‘maybe appropriate’ cases there was a significant decrease in the proportion that deviated from the AUC over time (P = 0.0076). The main reasons for deviation were that an open reduction was performed due to difficulty with closed reduction (75% of deviations) or the surgery was not performed emergently (25% of deviations). The vague definition of ‘emergent’ and not allowing for open reduction if needed are limitations of the AUC that should be clarified or improved by the AAOS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.