Introduction
Fish bone foreign body (FFB) impaction in the upper aerodigestive tract is a common cause for emergency department referral. Its management varies in both diagnosis and treatment paradigms. Fish bone foreign bodies are more commonly found in the oropharynx in cases of patients < 40 years old, and in the esophagus in cases of patients > 40 years old. Symptoms are typically non-indicative for the location of the FFB, with the exception of foreign body sensation at/superior to the cervical esophagus. A lack of findings during the physical examination is routinely followed by imaging, with computed tomography (CT) being the preferred modality. In practice, many patients undergo unnecessary imaging studies, including CT scans.
Objectives
To identify patients with suspected fish bone impaction who do not require CT imaging and can be safely discharged.
Data Synthesis
We have searched the PubMed database for the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms:
fish bone
,
fish foreign body
AND
oropharynx
,
hypopharynx
,
esophagus
,
flexible
esophagoscopy
, and
rigid
esophagoscopy
. Our search in the English language yielded 32 papers. Case reports were included, since they highlighted rare and serious complications.
Conclusion
In patients > 40 years old suspected of fish bone impaction, non-contrast CT is recommended and should be urgently performed, even in the presence of ambiguous symptoms. However, in patients < 40 years old presenting within 24 hours from ingestion, imaging has little diagnostic value due to the low probability of esophageal fish bones. For this specific subgroup, in the absence of clinical findings, discharge without imaging studies may be considered safe.
Women with IVF twins are at a significantly higher risk of having preterm births, PIH/PET and cesarean section but there was no significant adverse effect on neonatal outcome except for a lower mean newborn birth weight.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.