Background: We sought to examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics present on admission to HHC associated with discharge to hospice. Methods: We used a 5% random sample of 2017 national Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was estimated for the primary outcome (discharge to hospice) to examine the associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of HHC patients. Results: Among 489, 230 HHC patients, 4268 were discharged to hospice. The median (interquartile range) length of HHC stay for patients discharged to hospice care was 33 (14-78) days. Compared to White patients, Black, Hispanic, and other race, (hazard ratio [HR] = .50 [95% confidence interval, CI = .44–.57]), (HR = .53 [95% CI = .46–.62]), and (HR = .49 [95% CI = .40–.61], respectively) was associated with shorter time to discharge to hospice care. Clinical characteristics including severe dependence in activities of daily (ADL) (HR = 1.68 [95% CI = 1.01–2.78]), cognitive impairment (HR = 1.10 [95% CI = 1.01–1.20]), disruptive behavior daily (HR = 1.11 [95% CI = 1.02–1.22]), and inability to feed oneself (HR = 4.78, 95% CI = 4.30, 5.31) was associated with shorter time to discharge to hospice. Symptoms of anxiety daily (HR = 1.55 [95% CI = 1.43–1.68]), and pain daily or all the time (HR = 1.54 [95% CI = 1.43–1.64]) were associated with shorter time to discharge to hospice. Conclusions: High symptom burden, ADL dependency, and cognitive impairment on admission to HHC services was associated with greater likelihood of discharge to hospice.

Background: Although home healthcare(HHC) clinicians increasingly provide care to a homebound population with advanced illness and high symptom burden,  we know little about how HHC clinicians navigate discussions about hospice with patients and families in this setting. Objective We sought to explore perspectives on transition from HHC to hospice among HHC nurses and social workers. Design PQualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Results: Fifteen nurses and 3 Social workers participated in the study. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Regulatory Forces of Hospice and HHC; (2) Structure of HHC; (3) Individual beliefs—Hospice means giving up; and (4) Dynamics of Communication in HHC to Facilitate Transitions to Hospice. Conclusion Introducing the option of hospice to patients and families nearing end-of-life in the HHC setting is complex and challenging.  Facilitators of hospice discussions in the HHC setting  include interdisciplinary team-based clinical review, clinical decision support tools to identify patients who are hospice-eligible, and staff training.  These factors provide targets for future interventions.

No abstract

No abstract

Consistent collaboration between nurses and social workers is important to ensure patients and families receive emotional support, caregiver resources, and assistance with long-term planning.