BackgroundThe history of African indigenous cattle and their adaptation to environmental and human selection pressure is at the root of their remarkable diversity. Characterization of this diversity is an essential step towards understanding the genomic basis of productivity and adaptation to survival under African farming systems.ResultsWe analyze patterns of African cattle genetic variation by sequencing 48 genomes from five indigenous populations and comparing them to the genomes of 53 commercial taurine breeds. We find the highest genetic diversity among African zebu and sanga cattle. Our search for genomic regions under selection reveals signatures of selection for environmental adaptive traits. In particular, we identify signatures of selection including genes and/or pathways controlling anemia and feeding behavior in the trypanotolerant N’Dama, coat color and horn development in Ankole, and heat tolerance and tick resistance across African cattle especially in zebu breeds.ConclusionsOur findings unravel at the genome-wide level, the unique adaptive diversity of African cattle while emphasizing the opportunities for sustainable improvement of livestock productivity on the continent.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1153-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Despite the substantial role that chickens have played in human societies across the world, both the geographic and temporal origins of their domestication remain controversial. To address this issue, we analyzed 863 genomes from a worldwide sampling of chickens and representatives of all four species of wild jungle fowl and each of the five subspecies of red jungle fowl (RJF). Our study suggests that domestic chickens were initially derived from the RJF subspecies Gallus gallus spadiceus whose present-day distribution is predominantly in southwestern China, northern Thailand and Myanmar. Following their domestication, chickens were translocated across Southeast and South Asia where they interbred locally with both RJF subspecies and other jungle fowl species. In addition, our results show that the White Leghorn chicken breed possesses a mosaic of divergent ancestries inherited from other subspecies of RJF. Despite the strong episodic gene flow from geographically divergent lineages of jungle fowls, our analyses show that domestic chickens undergo genetic adaptations that underlie their unique behavioral, morphological and reproductive traits. Our study provides novel insights into the evolutionary history of domestic chickens and a valuable resource to facilitate ongoing genetic and functional investigations of the world's most numerous domestic animal.
At least 150 indigenous African cattle breeds have been named, but the majority of African cattle populations remain largely uncharacterized. As cattle breeds and populations in Africa adapted to various local environmental conditions, they acquired unique features. We know now that the history of African cattle was particularly complex and while several of its episodes remain debated, there is no doubt that African cattle population evolved dramatically over time. Today, we find a mosaic of genetically diverse population from the purest Bos taurus to the nearly pure Bos indicus. African cattle are now found all across the continent, with the exception of the Sahara and the river Congo basin. They are found on the rift valley highlands as well as below sea level in the Afar depression. These unique livestock genetic resources are in danger to disappear rapidly following uncontrolled crossbreeding and breed replacements with exotic breeds. Breeding improvement programs of African indigenous livestock remain too few while paradoxically the demand of livestock products is continually increasing. Many African indigenous breeds are endangered now, and their unique adaptive traits may be lost forever. This paper reviews the unique known characteristics of indigenous African cattle populations while describing the opportunities, the necessity and urgency to understand and utilize these resources to respond to the needs of the people of the continent and to the benefit of African farmers.
Breeding programmes described as community-based (CBBP) typically relate to low-input systems with farmers having a common interest to improve and share their genetic resources. CBBPs are more frequent with keepers of small ruminants, in particular smallholders of local breeds, than with cattle, pigs or chickens with which farmers may have easier access to alternative programmes. Constraints that limit the adoption of conventional breeding technologies in low-input systems cover a range of organizational and technical aspects. The analysis of 8 CBBPs located in countries of Latin-America, Africa and Asia highlights the importance of bottom-up approaches and involvement of local institutions in the planning and implementation stages. The analysis also reveals a high dependence of these programmes on organizational, technical and financial support. Completely self-sustained CBBPs seem to be difficult to realize. There is a need to implement and document formal socio-economic evaluations of CBBPs to provide governments and other development agencies with the information necessary for creating sustainable CBBPs at larger scales.
EAT and AAI, along eigenvector 1, which explains ~15% of the total variation. AFT Muturu and N'Dama are close to EAT along the eigenvector 1. Most of the AFH cattle cluster together regardless of their breed memberships, leaving only Ankole, Mursi and Sheko outside the main cluster toward the AFT Muturu and N'Dama. The PCA results also show that Muturu and N'Dama, our representative of AFT population, are separated from the other cattle groups (eigenvector 2, ~2.5% of total variation). Sheko positions close to the AFH, as similarly reported in other studies 5,43 . Genetic clustering analysis using ADMIXTURE 44 corroborates the pattern found in PCA (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 2). Most of AFH show a similar proportion of taurine ancestry, around 25% on average. Only a few AFH breeds have elevated taurine ancestry: Ankole (53.37 ± 1.49%), Sheko (46.28 ± 2.03%) and Mursi (35.90 ± 2.16%). (Fig. 2b).Genetic distance and diversity. Pairwise F st were calculated to estimate the genetic distances between populations (n = 38) (Extended Data Fig. 3). Taurine (EUT, AST and AFT) show F st values of 0.1568 and 0.3287 on average against AFH and AAI, respectively.Across AFH, pairwise F st between breeds is close to zero, regardless of their phenotypic classification as African Zebu, Sanga or Zenga. Muturu and N'Dama show F st value of 0.1769, 0.1847 and 0.3734 against AFH, EAT and AAI, respectively.The genome-wide autosomal SNPs show reduced levels of heterozygosity in the taurine (0.0021 ± 0.0005/bp) compared to all other populations (0.0048 ± 0.0008/bp). Heterozygosity values of AFH are similarly higher across populations (0.0046 ± 0.0003/bp). AAI shows a higher level of heterozygosity compared to AFH (0.0052 ± 0.0014/bp) (Extended Data Fig. 4). The degree of inbreeding measured by runs of homozygosity (ROH) shows that taurine, including Muturu and N'Dama, have a higher level of inbreeding compared to the other and Ethiopia), the University of Khartoum (Sudan), and the National Biotechnology Development Agency (NABDA) (Nigeria). The following institutions and their personnel provided help for the sampling of the African cattle: ILRI Kapiti Ranch, Ministry of Animal Resources, Fisheries and Range (Sudan), Ol Pejeta Conservancy (Kenya), Institute of Biodiversity (Ethiopia), the Directors of Veterinary Services and the cattle keepers from Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Sudan. ILRI livestock genomics program is supported by the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.