В статье рассмотрены вопросы кадровых рисков в лесном хозяйстве страны. Определено, что отток из отрасли квалифицированных специалистов, создал реальной угрозу процессам лесохозяйственного производства и управления в части снижения их эффективности, привел к появлению элементов распада кадрового потенциала в лесном хозяйстве. Ежегодное количество вакансий в лесном хозяйстве за последние годы устойчиво стабильно и составляет 15 %. Показано, что формирование комплекса мер в рамках программы Российской Федерации «Развитие лесного хозяйства» направленных на поддержку и развитие кадрового потенциала отрасли, позволит решить вопросы привлечения в отрасль молодых специалистов. Целесообразно возрождение института наставничества и поддержки лесных династий.Усовершенствование отраслевой системы профессиональной подготовки кадров, позволит коренным образом модернизировать процесс формирования кадрового потенциала, закрепить кадры, дать им возможность карьерного роста.

The article deals with the complex groups of risks of state forest management: strategic; managerial; operational (natural and climatic), legal (legal), property (related to property, forest resources and land), financial, commercial, technological; informational; security risks; design (software); reputational. Macro-level risk factors determine the state forest policy, transformed into strategies, development programs and implemented at the level of the Ministry of Natural Resources. Risk factors at the meso-level of forest management determine the effectiveness of the interaction of the Federal Forestry Agency with participants in forestry relations in order to ensure rational, continuous and sustainable forest management, reproduction, protection and protection of forests. Micro-level factors are implemented in regional forestry systems. For the purpose of assessing their significance and probability of occurrence, an expert method was used, implemented at the meso and micro levels of state forest management. The most priority for the state forest management at the meso-level are strategic (programmatic), financial, commercial risk factors, as well as security risks, while for the micro-level, natural-climatic and personnel risk factors are also among the priorities. To create a unified state risk management system in forest management, it is necessary to develop a unified approach that takes into account complex risk groups differentiated in the context of regional systems.

The effective development of the forestry sector mainly depends on the specifics and ways of interaction between business entities and the bodies of government, since the land resources are owned by the state. The authors analyzed the normative legal acts regulating the interaction between the state and business entities in the sphere of forestry. They also systematized and analyzed the factors that determine the effectiveness of this interaction. Taking into account the activities of the government bodies and enterprises, the authors paid special attention to differentiation and systematization of the factors. After applying the interview method, organizing a brainstorm and carrying out the hierarchy analysis, the authors concluded that the economic factor is the most important. The authors formulated a number of recommendations concerning the regulatory and legislative support as well as the infrastructure provision and the support for small and medium-sized enterprises. The authors generalized a lot of analytical, research and legislative material to give an idea of the modern forms and methods of interaction between the executive authorities and business entities in the sphere of forestry. Apart from that, the authors analyzed the interaction of the mentioned structures in the sparsely wooded areas.

The article deals with the risk factors in the forestry of the country. The functions of risk management, implemented in forestry as a control system and a subsystem of management, are presented. The system of minimization of managerial risks and their consequences operating at the level of the federal forestry agency is considered. The results of an expert assessment of complex risk groups, and the most significant of them, are presented. The most significant and entailing serious risk consequences are strategic (programmatic), financial, commercial risk factors, as well as security risks, climatic and personnel risks. The need to modernize the existing forestry risk management system in a direction that provides greater transparency of information required for management has been determined.

No abstract