No abstract

Phytoscreening for chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOC) in tree core samples is influenced by many factors. For instance, greater fluctuations are observed for CVOC concentrations in samples taken around the trunk at a fixed height compared to samples taken directly next to each other. To avoid false negatives and inaccurate interpretation of the results, we investigated this radial directional dependence as well as the influence of rainwater on measured concentrations. CVOC analysis was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) following Solid-Phase-Microextraction (SPME). Phytoscreening was successfully carried out at three sites using this method. In addition, sap samples were taken from white birches during their budding period as a novel phytoscreening approach. Birch sap sampling is shown to be a suitable means of characterizing contaminant distribution within the soil subsurface. Radial directional dependence of CVOC concentrations varies by almost 80% for tree core samples and 50% for birch sap samples. Variations in concentrations measured around the trunk do not, however, provide information on the inflow direction of contaminated groundwater. The weather conditions were shown to have a greater influence so that CVOC concentrations measured from samples taken during colder, rainier weather were, on average, a factor of 100 lower than those taken during a warm and dry period. Nevertheless phytoscreening is adequate for CVOC characterization in the soil subsurface if the campaign is carried out during a dry weather period, the results then can be taken as being semiquantitative.

No abstract

The reliable characterization of subsurface contamination of spatially extended contaminated sites is a challenging task, especially with an unknown history of land use. Conventional technologies often fail due to temporal and financial constraints and thus hinder the redevelopment of abandoned areas in particular. Here we compare two site screening techniques that can be applied quickly at relatively low cost, namely Direct Push (DP)‐based groundwater sampling and tree core sampling. The effectiveness of both methods is compared for a rural megasite contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons. Unexpected pollution hot spots could be identified using both of these methods, while tree coring even enabled the delineation of the contaminant plume flowing into an adjacent wetland inaccessible for DP units. Both methods showed a good agreement in revealing the spatial pattern of the contamination. The correlation between groundwater concentrations and equivalent concentrations in wood was linear and highly significant for trichloroethene. Correlation was less obvious for its metabolite cis‐dichloroethene, but still significant. As outcome of our study we recommend tree coring and for initial screening in combination with a DP sampling to retrieve quantitative data on groundwater pollutants in order to assess the contamination situation of a non‐ or only partly investigated site. The subsequent placement of monitoring wells for long‐term monitoring of contamination levels is recommended. A combination of methods would achieve more relevant information at comparable or possibly even lower efforts in comparison to a conventional site investigation.

Direct and indirect effects (DIERec) of the recovery of secondary resources are in the range of 500 million tons per year in Germany; energy savings are 1.4 million TJ. These savings are between 10 and 20% of the total. The effects of materials recovery exceed those of energy recovery by far except for secondary plastic material, where DIERec from energy recovery is higher by factor of 2.7. Untapped potential for the recovery of secondary resources exists in the fine fraction of bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration, mainly Cu and precious metals, and in urban mining.