The paper deals with the analysis of the impact of public administration on the innovation development. With purposes to identify the main scientific directions of analysis among the scientific community, the authors did the bibliometric study. For the reviews, the authors selected 1167 papers which indexing in Scopus. For the visualising the findings of bibliometric analysis, the VOSviewer was used. The results allow allocating 10 clusters of scientific directions which analysed the issues of innovations and public administrations. The first most significant clusters could «innovation» analysed the efficiency of the public administration through the effectiveness of innovation implementation. The second clusters connected with the government innovation policy and located close to the first clusters. The third cluster «public administration» involved 40 items and 4699 links. The scientists with Italian and American affiliations had the most significant shares of papers. At the same time, the European funding allocated the most significant share of financing such research. The hypothesis of the investigation was checking the linking between levels of innovation development and countries’ rating on the efficiency of public administration using the correlation analysis and least square model. For the checking hypothesis, the authors used the software EViews11. The authors analysed the Worldwide Governance Indicators as the base indicators for the assessment of public administration efficiency. For the analysis, the authors used data for EU countries and Ukraine. As Ukraine has started the integration process, the Ukrainian policy should be synchronised with the EU. The findings proved the correlation between variables. Thus, the increasing of government efficiency and the rule of law lead to increasing by 0,094 and 0,043 points the level of innovation development of the country corresponding. At the same time, the increasing regulation policy provoke the increase of innovation development by 0,08 points. The less impact had the variables as follows: sustainability competitiveness of the country and volume of expenditure on research and development. After analysis of the empirical data, the reviews of the management and legal instruments was done. Considering the EU experience, the authors identified the system of tools which lead to increasing of public administration efficiency as follows: legislation on property rights, anti-corruption directives, digitalisation of government authorities at all levels. For the future investigation, the time and range of the countries should be extended. Keywords governance, management, law, property right, innovation.

The purpose of the study is to clarify the essence and outline the functions of the international convention-institutional mechanism for the observance and protection of human rights, as well as to reveal the directions of its interaction with the national system of administrative and legal protection of the rights and freedoms of persons with disabilities of Ukraine. We use methods of scientific knowledge, in particular system-functional, formal-legal, technical-legal, methods of analysis and synthesis. The National system of ensuring the rights and freedoms of persons with disabilities of Ukraine, which is presented in the form of a three-level structure, among which: organizational level - is implemented by the Commissioner of the President of Ukraine for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Government Commissioner for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; management level – the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine; functional level – individual central bodies of the executive power of Ukraine, their structural units and local self-government bodies. The key directions and principles of coordinated interaction of public administration subjects with relevant international institutions, primarily the UN and the Council of Europe, in the analyzed area are indicated.

The activity of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine is based on the principles of legality. The tools used by the prosecutor in his work must be normatively defined and enshrined in law. Failure to comply with these conditions may lead to different interpretations of the actions of prosecutors both by lawyers in general and directly by the courts in making decisions. Judicial practice and departmental regulations show that prosecutors use a tool such as "monitoring of court decisions", the definition of which is not enshrined in law. Therefore, the article analyzes the issue of prosecutors' use of such a tool as monitoring court decisions. In particular, the connection between the concept of "monitoring of court decisions by the prosecutor" and such fundamental principles of various forms of proceedings as publicity of the trial and openness of information about the case. The need to disclose the content of the concept of "monitoring of court decisions by the prosecutor" is pointed out. It is noted about the need to define this concept as a tool of the prosecutor, and to distinguish it from the concept of "grounds for representation by the prosecutor of the interests of the state in court." Emphasis is placed on the expediency of normative consolidation of the concept of "monitoring of court decisions by the prosecutor". On the basis of researches of domestic scientists, the author's definition of the concept "monitoring by the prosecutor of court decisions" is given. According to the results of the analysis, the source of monitoring court decisions was recorded. The purpose of monitoring court decisions has been clarified. There is an idea of the need for the prosecutor to ensure the frequency of monitoring. The results of the prosecutor's use of monitoring court decisions are highlighted. The connection between the use of this concept and the exercise of the prosecutor's powers to represent the interests of the state in court has been established. The wording of the relevant concept of "monitoring of court decisions by the prosecutor" gives the legislator the opportunity to use it when making amendments to existing regulations governing the activities of the prosecutor, and can also be used to improve subordinate regulations.

Питання щодо чіткого окреслення кола суб’єктів міжнародного права було й залишається актуальним та надважливим у міжнародно-правовій доктрині. Однією з головних для теоретиків є проблема відношення фізичної особи до кола таких суб’єктів, а зі стрімким розвитком міжнародно-правової практики доречніше було б ставити питання про те, у якій ролі та з якими застереженнями особа буде розглядатися як суб’єкт міжнародного права. У статті проведено аналіз проблем щодо особливостей визнання фізичної особи як суб’єкта міжнародного права. З даного питання розглянуто різні точки зору вчених, як національних, так і закордонних. У доктрині міжнародного права існують різні підходи з приводу визначення кола суб’єктів міжнародного права. Наведене обумовлено, насамперед, відсутністю єдиного розуміння сутності суб’єктів міжнародного права та ознак, які їм притаманні. Питання про міжнародну правосуб’єктність фізичної особи (індивіда) у міжнародно-правовій літературі і дотепер є предметом гострих дискусій, оскільки міжнародно-правові акти, тобто узгоджені державами обов’язкові міжнародні документи, у яких фізична особа визнавалась би суб’єктом міжнародного права, відсутні. Сьогодні міжнародне право вже не є виключно таким, що регулює міждержавні відносини, а державний суверенітет не характеризується непорушністю. Загальновідо­мо, що міжнародне право регулює відносини також за участю юридичних, фізичних осіб, безпосередньо наділяючи їх правами і обов’язками, які є міжнародно-правовими за своєю природою. Доктрина міжнародного права визнає спеціальну правосуб’єктність фізичної особи як здатність бути учасником певного кола правовідносин у межах окремої галузі міжнародного права, незважаючи на те що фізичні особи ще не володіють здатністю створювати норми міжнародного права. Отже, усі суб’єкти міжнародного права апріорі не можуть бути рівними між собою в частині своїх прав і обов’язків – з точки зору правосуб’єктності суб’єкти володіють різним обсягом міжнародно-правових зобов’язань.  

No abstract