Biosimilars are cheaper than original drugs and are thus of interest to the public. The aim of this article is to assess the benefits of introducing more than one biosimilar for the same substance (active pharmaceutical ingredient, API). The hypothesis is that the introduction of successive biosimilars of a specific original drug reduces the price of the selected API. The study focuses on drug prices varying with the successive arrival of new biosimilars. Three drugs that have at least three reimbursed biosimilars on the market were selected, two from the same therapeutic group (adalimumab and infliximab) and one (trastuzumab) representing another class of drugs. The following data were analyzed: price variation after the introduction of the first, second, and third biosimilar, and the average price reduction for all three biosimilars. Additionally, a literature review was conducted. The reimbursement of each new biosimilar is beneficial since it is associated with a price reduction in percentage terms. However, the first biosimilar brought about the greatest savings due to the higher initial prices of the original drugs and to Polish reimbursement rules. This article is helpful for when taking healthcare decisions regarding the pricing of and reimbursement for new biosimilars.

The EU approved the first biosimilar drug in 2006. By 2017, the EU had authorized the highest number of biosimilars worldwide, acquiring considerable experience in their use and safety. In May 2019, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) search engine showed 54 authorized biosimilars. Biosimilars reduce public expenditure; however, the discussion about their potential disadvantages is still ongoing. Each country adopts different regulations on the interchangeability, switching, and substitution of a reference medicine by its biosimilar, since the EMA does not regulate this issue. Additionally, each nation has a unique reimbursement system, which results in significant differences in patients’ access to biosimilars. The importance of securing a higher availability of these cheaper versions of biological drugs is well-recognized. The better the access to these biosimilars is, the lower the overall drug expenditure and need for rationing would be, and therefore the better treatment results. The aim of this paper is to compare selected aspects of reimbursement and access to the EMA authorized biosimilar medicines in two countries – France and Poland. The stated drug policy goal of both countries is to significantly improve biosimilar implementation in the coming years. The research is based on an analysis of four main sources: the EMA biosimilars database, the Polish reimbursement list published by the Polish Ministry of Health, and two French reimbursement databases published by the French Ministry of Health. An additional literature review was conducted. The expected results concentrate on differences in the number of reimbursed biosimilars, the average time between EMA authorization and country reimbursement decision date, and the availability of biosimilars registered outside of the centralized (EMA) procedure. These findings could identify areas of improvement and help with discussions on how to optimize the reach of biosimilars, as well as improve French-Polish collaboration on this matter.

Purpose: Savings resulting from the use of biosimilar medicines (biosimilars) are important to the management of national drug administration. In September 2018, the Council of Ministers adopted the National Drug Policy (NDP) for 2018–2022. One of the priorities of the document set forth by the Ministry of Health was to increase the proportional use of biosimilars. The purpose of this article is to assess the changes and the dynamics in infliximab (Remicade®) expenditures and the share of biosimilars within the infliximab market before and after the announcement of the NDP. Design/methodology/approach: The analysis is based on the example of infliximab, a biological medicine widely used in dermatology, gastroenterology and rheumatology. The analysis period encompasses data for one year before the document was adopted, i.e. the period from September 2017 until August 2018 (year I) as well as one year after the document came into force, i.e. the period from September 2018 until August 2019 (year II). Comparative analyses were based on the statistical data of monthly expenditures and the number of packages reimbursed by the National Health Fund (NHF). Fixed base and chain dynamics indices were used in the analysis. Findings: An increase in the expenditure and the number of packages sold in year II was observed for biosimilars. Research limitations/implications: It should be stressed, however, that the article pertains to a single example – the infliximab market, and that numerous other important factors may affect the sales of biosimilars.

No abstract

Background: Congenital defect gastroschisis manifests as a defect in the sheath in the intestine of the newborn, which is not covered by the hernia sac. In this case, the priority task of the neonatal nurse is to diagnose patient care problems quickly and accurately. Choosing the correct care plan elements has a significant impact on shortening the duration of hospitalization, reducing the number and severity of complications, and preventing their recurrence. The purpose of this study was to formulate a care plan for a newborn with diagnosed congenital defect gastroschisis in the postoperative period, using the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNPTM) within the nursing documentation and decision support system, the “ADPIECare Dorothea” software. Methods: After a review of the relevant literature and nursing documentation, a case study of a newborn with the congenital defect gastroschisis was described. A care plan was prepared using ICNP and the “ADPIECare” software. Results: It was possible to organize and standardize care plans to provide consistent and comprehensive professional nursing care. The system supporting nursing decisions suggested interventions personalized for the nursing diagnoses and to the patient needs. Conclusions: Our findings can help to optimize the nurse’s work organization to improve health care quality, outcomes, and effectiveness.