BACKGROUNDPituitary apoplexy represents one of the most serious, life threatening endocrine emergencies that requires immediate management. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) can induce pituitary apoplexy in those patients who have insidious pituitary adenoma coincidentally.CASE SUMMARYA 46-year-old woman, with a history of hypertension and menorrhagia was transferred to our hospital from a secondary care hospital after complaints of headache and vomiting, with loss of consciousness 5 min after an injection of GnRHa. The drug was prescribed by her gynecologist due to the presence of uterine myomas. The clinical neurological examination revealed right cranial nerve III palsy, ptosis and movement limitation of the right eye. Our first clinical consideration was a pituitary apoplexy. Blood hormonal analysis revealed mild hyperprolactinemia and high follicle stimulating hormone level; PTH and calcium was high with glomerular filtration rate mildly to moderately decrease. A computed tomography scan, revealed an enlarged pituitary gland (3.5 cm) impinging upon the optic chiasm with bone involvement of the sella. Following contrast media administration, the lesion showed homogeneous enhancement with high-density focus that suggests hemorrhagic infarction of the tumor. Transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery was perfomed and adenomatous tissue was removed. Immunohistochemistry was positive for luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular-stimulating hormone (FSH). A solid hypoechoic nodule (14 mm x 13 mm x 16 mm) was found in the caudal portion of the right thyroid lobe after a parathyroid ultrasound. A genetic test of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) was negative. A right lower parathyroidectomy was performed and the pathologic study showed the presence of an encapsulated parathyroid carcinoma of 1.5 cm. A MEN type 4 genetic test was performed result was negative.CONCLUSIONThis case demonstrates an uncommon complication of GnRH agonist therapy in the setting of a pituitary macroadenoma and the casual finding of parathyroid carcinoma. It also highlights the importance of suspecting the presence of a multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome and to carry out relevant genetic studies.

This study aims to investigate the adequacy of pathology reports of specimens from patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) operated in our institution. Retrospective analysis of the pathology reports of all patients diagnosed with DTC in our area, from 1 January 2006 through 30 June 2011, was done. Sixty-eight patients were diagnosed with DTC. All reports were descriptive. In all the reports, but one, one or more core data items (according to the Royal College of Pathologists) were missing. Information about 1 and 2 items was lacking in 7.4 and 42.6 % of the reports, respectively. The rest were missing three or more data. Lymphovascular invasion, histology subtype, and completeness of excision were, in this order, the three most frequently omitted data. Sometimes, the information in question was not explicitly expressed but could be extrapolated from the data available. The pathology reports of DTC specimens frequently miss some of the information considered necessary to provide a comprehensive patient care.

No abstract