ObjectiveThe best approach for Helicobacter pylori management remains unclear. An audit process is essential to ensure clinical practice is aligned with best standards of care.DesignInternational multicentre prospective non-interventional registry starting in 2013 aimed to evaluate the decisions and outcomes in H. pylori management by European gastroenterologists. Patients were registered in an e-CRF by AEG-REDCap. Variables included demographics, previous eradication attempts, prescribed treatment, adverse events and outcomes. Data monitoring was performed to ensure data quality. Time-trend and geographical analyses were performed.Results30 394 patients from 27 European countries were evaluated and 21 533 (78%) first-line empirical H. pylori treatments were included for analysis. Pretreatment resistance rates were 23% to clarithromycin, 32% to metronidazole and 13% to both. Triple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin was most commonly prescribed (39%), achieving 81.5% modified intention-to-treat eradication rate. Over 90% eradication was obtained only with 10-day bismuth quadruple or 14-day concomitant treatments. Longer treatment duration, higher acid inhibition and compliance were associated with higher eradication rates. Time-trend analysis showed a region-dependent shift in prescriptions including abandoning triple therapies, using higher acid-inhibition and longer treatments, which was associated with an overall effectiveness increase (84%–90%).ConclusionManagement of H. pylori infection by European gastroenterologists is heterogeneous, suboptimal and discrepant with current recommendations. Only quadruple therapies lasting at least 10 days are able to achieve over 90% eradication rates. European recommendations are being slowly and heterogeneously incorporated into routine clinical practice, which was associated with a corresponding increase in effectiveness.

SUMMARY BackgroundThe decreasing efficacy of H. pylori eradication treatments over time makes the search for better regimens and adjuvant medications a priority.

Background Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy has been suggested as first‐line and rescue alternative for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Our objective was to perform a meta‐analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of single capsule Pylera® (bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline) plus a proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) in any line of treatment. Methods Studies were selected up to October 2018. Outcomes were eradication and adverse events (AEs) rates pooled using the generic inverse variance method. Results In total, 30 studies (6482 patients) were included in the systematic review. The intention‐to‐treat (ITT) efficacy was 90% (95% CI: 87%‐92%, 21 studies, I2 = 88%) in first‐line therapy, 89% (95% CI: 86%‐93%, 12 studies, I2 = 78%) in second‐line and 82% (95% CI: 78%‐87%, nine studies, I2 = 60%) in third‐line; with no differences by the type or dosage of PPI used. For metronidazole‐resistant infection, the ITT efficacy as first‐line therapy was 93% (95% CI: 90%‐96%, six studies, I2 = 0%). In second‐line therapies where patients had been previously treated with clarithromycin, the ITT efficacy was 90% (95% CI: 87%‐93%, 11 studies, I2 = 78%). The overall incidence of AEs was 43% (95% CI: 35%‐50%, 24 studies, I2 = 92%) and they were mostly mild. In nearly 3% of the cases, treatment was interrupted due to AEs. Conclusions A 10‐day treatment with Pylera® achieved an effective eradication rate of approximately 90% both in first‐ and second‐line therapy. This applies regardless of the type and dose of the PPI, in patients with clarithromycin‐ or metronidazole‐resistant strains, and in those previously treated with clarithromycin.