No abstract

An international expert group which includes 30 organisations (pharmaceutical companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) has shared data on the use of recovery animals in the assessment of pharmaceutical safety for early development. These data have been used as an evidence-base to make recommendations on the inclusion of recovery animals in toxicology studies to achieve scientific objectives, while reducing animal use. Recovery animals are used in pharmaceutical development to provide information on the potential for a toxic effect to translate into long-term human risk. They are included on toxicology studies to assess whether effects observed during dosing persist or reverse once treatment ends. The group devised a questionnaire to collect information on the use of recovery animals in general regulatory toxicology studies to support first-in-human studies. Questions focused on study design, the rationale behind inclusion or exclusion and the impact this had on internal and regulatory decisions. Data on 137 compounds (including 53 biologicals and 78 small molecules) from 259 studies showed wide variation in where, when and why recovery animals were included. An analysis of individual study and programme design shows that there are opportunities to reduce the use of recovery animals without impacting drug development.

Determination of concentration-time profiles in cynomolgus monkeys of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody against a soluble target revealed a substantial discrepancy between a generic anti-human IgG capture/detection and target bridging assay with the target bridging assay leading to dose- and time-dependent underquantification of drug concentrations, lack of parallelism and subsequently different pharmacokinetic parameters. In contrast, plasma levels derived from a target capture and an anti-idiotypic antibody bridging assay were in close concordance with the generic assay and demonstrated parallelism with high precision across several dilutions. The results provide a practical attempt to overcome nonparallelism by employing alternative assay formats utilizing tailored assay reagent combinations in order to obtain unbiased pharmacokinetic data.