Process-based cognitive trainings (PCTs) and novelty interventions are two traditional approaches aiming to prevent cognitive decline and dementia. However, both have their limitations. PCTs improve performance only in cognitive tests similar to the training tasks with inconsistent transfer effects on dissimilar tests. We argue that this learning specificity is due to a low training task variability. Novelty interventions are characterized by a high task variability but do not target specific processing demands affected in aging and dementia. To overcome the limitations of both approaches, we developed a process-based novelty intervention using a card and board game-based training approach. Here, we use highly variable tasks, which overlap in targeted processing demands ("overlapping variability" framework). Another nontraditional training approach combines cognitively with physically challenging tasks to induce multimechanistic effects, which might even interact positively. Initial results of both synergistic approaches indicate their potential to enhance broad cognitive abilities and prevent dementia.
Key Points Question Does a multimodal nonpharmacological approach prevent delirium in older patients undergoing elective surgical procedures? Findings This stepped-wedge cluster trial recruited 1470 patients 70 years and older who were randomized in 5 clusters to patient-centered evidence-based intervention (ie, personalized stimulation, company, relaxation) vs routine care. The intervention reduced delirium incidence after various major procedures, most significantly in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery; the intervention did not change cardiac surgery postoperative delirium incidence. Meaning Results of this stepped-wedge cluster trial suggest the implementation of this multimodal nonpharmacological delirium prevention program may improve delivery of targeted care and patient outcomes in older patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgical procedures.
BackgroundWhile observational studies show that an active lifestyle including cognitive, physical, and social activities is associated with a reduced risk of cognitive decline and dementia, experimental evidence from corresponding training interventions is more inconsistent with less pronounced effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare training- and lifestyle-related changes in cognition. This is the first study investigating these associations within the same time period and sample.MethodsFifty-four older adults at risk of dementia were assigned to 10 weeks of physical training, cognitive training, or a matched wait-list control condition. Lifestyle was operationalized as the variety of self-reported cognitive, physical, and social activities before study participation. Cognitive performance was assessed with an extensive test battery prior to and after the intervention period as well as at a 3-month follow-up. Composite cognition measures were obtained by means of a principal component analysis. Training- and lifestyle-related changes in cognition were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. The strength of their association was compared with paired t-tests.ResultsNeither training intervention improved global cognition in comparison to the control group (p = .08). In contrast, self-reported lifestyle was positively associated with benefits in global cognition (p < .001) and specifically in memory (p < .001). Moreover, the association of an active lifestyle with cognitive change was significantly stronger than the benefits of the training interventions with respect to global cognition (ps < .001) and memory (ps < .001).ConclusionsThe associations of an active lifestyle with cognitive change over time in a dementia risk group were stronger than the effects of short-term, specific training interventions. An active lifestyle may differ from training interventions in dosage and variety of activities as well as intrinsic motivation and enjoyment. These factors might be crucial for designing novel interventions, which are more efficient than currently available training interventions.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01061489. Registered February 2, 2010.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1018-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Psychosocial stress and physical, cognitive, and social activity predict the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. The aim of this study was to elucidate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), irisin, and the kynurenine pathway (KP) as potential underlying biological correlates. We evaluated associations of irisin and the KP with BDNF in serum and with cognition, stress, and activities. Furthermore, changes in serum concentrations of BDNF, irisin, and KP metabolites were investigated after physical or cognitive training. Forty-seven older adults at risk of dementia were assigned to 10 weeks of physical training, cognitive training, or a wait-list control condition. Previous physical, cognitive, and social activities and stressful life events were recorded; global cognition, episodic memory, and executive functions were assessed. Serum levels of L-kynurenine, kynurenic acid, 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK), and quinolinic acid (QUIN) were determined by validated assays based on liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. BDNF and irisin serum levels were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. BDNF and irisin correlated positively with global cognition and episodic memory, while the neurotoxic metabolite QUIN correlated negatively with executive functions. Stressful life events were associated with reduced BDNF and increased 3-HK. 3-HK decreased after cognitive training, while BDNF tended to increase after physical training. This suggests that psychosocial stress as well as cognitive and physical training may impact BDNF serum levels and the KP. Irisin and QUIN may constitute novel serum biomarkers of cognitive impairment, in addition to BDNF. Larger scale trials are needed to replicate and extend these novel findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.