Introduction Numerous CE-marked SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDT) are offered in Europe, several of them with unconfirmed quality claims. Aim We performed an independent head-to-head evaluation of the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT offered in Germany. Methods We addressed the sensitivity of 122 Ag RDT in direct comparison using a common evaluation panel comprised of 50 specimens. Minimum sensitivity of 75% for panel specimens with a PCR quantification cycle (Cq) ≤ 25 was used to identify Ag RDT eligible for reimbursement in the German healthcare system. Results The sensitivity of different SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT varied over a wide range. The sensitivity limit of 75% for panel members with Cq ≤ 25 was met by 96 of the 122 tests evaluated; 26 tests exhibited lower sensitivity, few of which failed completely. Some RDT exhibited high sensitivity, e.g. 97.5 % for Cq < 30. Conclusions This comparative evaluation succeeded in distinguishing less sensitive from better performing Ag RDT. Most of the evaluated Ag RDT appeared to be suitable for fast identification of acute infections associated with high viral loads. Market access of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT should be based on minimal requirements for sensitivity and specificity.

CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes are stimulated by GBV-C to secrete antiretroviral factors, inhibiting R5- and X4-HIV strains. As no induction of SDF-1 and no down-regulation of the respective receptor CXCR4 could be observed, it is likely that additional unidentified factors causing inhibition of X4-HIV strains are induced by GBV-C.

Objective Independent evaluation of the sensitivity of CE-marked SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDT) offered in Germany. Method The sensitivity of 122 Ag RDT was adressed using a common evaluation panel. Minimum sensitivity of 75% for panel members with CT<25 was used for differentiation of devices eligible for reimbursement in in the German healthcare system. Results The sensitivity of different SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT varied over a wide range. The sensitivity limit of 75% for panel members with CT <25 was met by 96 of the 122 tests evaluated; 26 tests exhibited lower sensitivity, few of which were completely failing. Some devices exhibited high sensitivity, e.g. 100% for CT<30. Conclusion This comparative evaluation succeeded to distinguish less sensitive from better performing Ag RDT. Most of the Ag RDT evaluated appear to be suitable for fast identification of acute infections associated with high viral loads. Market access of SARS-CoV-2 Ag RDT should be based on minimal requirements for sensitivity and specificity.

SummaryInfection with Helicobacter pylori induces various gastric diseases, including ulceration, gastritis and neoplasia. As H. pylori-induced cellular mechanisms leading to these disease states are widely unclear, we analysed the phosphoproteome of H. pylori-infected gastric epithelial cells. Phosphoproteins from infected cells were enriched using affinity columns and analysed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Eleven novel phosphoproteins that showed differentially regulated phosphorylation levels during H. pylori infection were identified. Interestingly, the identified proteins were actinbinding, transport and folding, RNA/DNA-binding or cancer-associated proteins. We analysed functions of one identified H. pylori-regulated candidate, the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). H. pylori induced VASP phosphorylation at residues Ser157, Ser239 and Thr278, which was enhanced by the bacterial oncogene cytotoxin-associated gene A. Overexpression of a phosphorylation-resistant VASP mutant efficiently blocked host cell elongation. We identified cGMP-dependent protein kinase G-mediated Ser239 and Thr278 phosphorylation of VASP as a crucial event in H. pylori-dependent host cell elongation. These results suggest that phosphorylated VASP could be a novel target candidate for therapeutic intervention in H. pylori-related gastric diseases.