In the context of major global environmental challenges such as food security, climate change, fresh water scarcity and biodiversity loss, the protection and the sustainable management of soil resources in Africa are of paramount importance. To raise the awareness of the general public, stakeholders, policy makers and the science community to the importance of soil in Africa, the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission has produced the Soil Atlas of Africa. To that end, a new harmonised soil map at the continental scale has been produced. The steps of the construction of the new area-class map are presented, the basic information being derived from the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD). We show how the original data were updated and modified according to the World Reference Base for Soil Resources classification system. The corrections concerned boundary issues, areas with no information, soil patterns, river and drainage networks, and dynamic features such as sand dunes, water bodies and coastlines. In comparison to the initial map derived from HWSD, the new map represents a correction of 13% of the soil data for the continent. The map is available for downloading.

Landslide hazard remains poorly characterized on regional and global scales. In the tropics in particular, the lack of knowledge on landslide hazard is in sharp contrast with the high landslide susceptibility of the region. Moreover, landslide hazard in the tropics is expected to increase in the future in response to growing demographic pressure and climate and land use changes. With precipitation as the primary trigger for landslides in the tropics, there is a need for an accurate determination of rainfall thresholds for landslide triggering based on regional rainfall information as well as reliable data on landslide occurrences. Here, we present the landslide inventory for the central section of the western branch of the East African Rift (LIWEAR). Specific attention is given to the spatial and temporal accuracy, reliability, and geomorphological meaning of the data. The LIWEAR comprises 143 landslide events with known location and date over a span of 48 years from 1968 to 2016. Reported landslides are found to be dominantly related to the annual precipitation patterns and increasing demographic pressure. Field observations in combination with local collaborations revealed substantial biases in the LIWEAR related to landslide processes, landslide impact, and the remote context of the study area. In order to optimize data collection and minimize biases and uncertainties, we propose a threephase, Search-Store-Validate, workflow as a framework for data collection in a data-poor context. The validated results indicate that the proposed methodology can lead to a reliable landslide inventory in a data-poor context, valuable for regional landslide hazard assessment at the considered temporal and spatial resolutions.

No abstract

Accurate precipitation data are fundamental for understanding and mitigating the disastrous effects of many natural hazards in mountainous areas. Floods and landslides, in particular, are potentially deadly events that can be mitigated with advanced warning, but accurate forecasts require timely estimation of precipitation, which is problematic in regions such as tropical Africa with limited gauge measurements. Satellite rainfall estimates (SREs) are of great value in such areas, but rigorous validation is required to identify the uncertainties linked to SREs for hazard applications. This paper presents results of an unprecedented record of gauge data in the western branch of the East African Rift, with temporal resolutions ranging from 30 min to 24 h and records from 1998 to 2018. These data were used to validate the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) research version and near-real-time products for 3-hourly, daily, and monthly rainfall accumulations, over multiple spatial scales. Results indicate that there are at least two factors that led to the underestimation of TMPA at the regional level: complex topography and high rainfall intensities. The TMPA near-real-time product shows overall stronger rainfall underestimations but lower absolute errors and a better performance at higher rainfall intensities compared to the research version. We found area-averaged TMPA rainfall estimates relatively more suitable in order to move toward regional hazard assessment, compared to data from scarcely distributed gauges with limited representativeness in the context of high rainfall variability.

No abstract