BACKGROUND Sugammadex allows for rapid reversal of muscle relaxation after the use of rocuronium or vecuronium. The lowest recommended dose is 2 mg kg−1 intravenously when there are two twitches during the train-of-four stimulation. OBJECTIVE To study the efficacy and risks of a lower dose of sugammadex administered earlier. DESIGN Monocentric randomised controlled double-blind study. SETTING Academic hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients were enrolled and randomised in 8 groups of 10 patients, 56 were finally evaluated. INTERVENTIONS Patients were distributed in two clusters constituting four groups each. In the first cluster, injections were administered after the return of one twitch with the train-of-four (TOF1). In the second cluster, injections were delivered after the return of two twitches with the TOF (TOF2). We created four groups in each cluster for different dosages: placebo, 0.5, 1 or 2 mg kg−1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Time between the injection of sugammadex and full recovery (TOF ratio > 0.9) that is expressed in minutes. RESULTS Fifty-six successive patients were assessed between February and August 2018. The difference to TOF greater than 0.9 was not statistically significant between groups with the same dose administered at different times (F value = 0.001, P value = 0.975). There was a significant difference between groups with a different dosage administered at the same time (F ratio = 28.34; P value <0.0001). Concerning the time to TOF greater than 0.9 from the time point of TOF1, the timing of the dosages were statistically significant using log rank test (P < 0.0001). No patient presented a reparalysis. CONCLUSION No difference between injecting sugammadex at TOF1 or TOF2 was found regarding time to full recovery. Difference regarding sugammadex quantity was found and compatible with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov: ‘BRIDION_ERASME’, EudraCT: 2017-005074-19.

Cangrelor is a P2Y12 inhibitor antiplatelet agent, with a rapid onset and offset. The available literature only reviews short-term administration over a few hours. We describe 5 patients who received cangrelor for >1 month in a neurosurgical intensive care unit due to a very high likelihood of requiring emergency revision surgery. Despite multiple therapeutic interruptions for surgical procedures, no hemorrhagic events occurred, and there was only one transient ischemic event, which occurred during transition from cangrelor to ticagrelor. Cangrelor can be a therapeutic option for patients with a high likelihood of requiring revision neurosurgery after intracranial stenting.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic rhabdomyolysis (RM) is common and contributes to the development of medical complications, of which acute renal failure is the best described. Some authors have described an association between elevated aminotransferases and RM, suggesting the possibility of associated liver damage. Our study aims to evaluate the relationship between liver function and RM in hemorrhagic trauma patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study conducted in a level 1 trauma center analyzing 272 severely injured patients transfused within 24 hours and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2015 to June 2021. Patients with significant direct liver injury (abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] >3) were excluded. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed, and groups were stratified according to the presence of intense RM (creatine kinase [CK] >5000 U/L). Liver failure was defined by a prothrombin time (PT)-ratio <50% and an alanine transferase (ALT) >500 U/L simultaneously. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson’s or Spearman’s coefficient depending on the distribution after log transformation to evaluate the association between serum CK and biological markers of hepatic function. Risk factors for the development of liver failure were defined with a stepwise logistic regression analysis of all relevant explanatory factors significantly associated with the bivariate analysis. RESULTS: RM (CK >1000 U/L) was highly prevalent in the global cohort (58.1%), and 55 (23.2%) patients presented with intense RM. We found a significant positive correlation between RM biomarkers (CK and myoglobin) and liver biomarkers (aspartate transferase [AST], ALT, and bilirubin). Log-CK was positively correlated with log-AST (r = 0.625, P < .001) and log-ALT (r = 0.507, P < .001) and minimally with log-bilirubin (r = 0.262, P < .001). Intensive care unit stays were longer for intense RM patients (7 [4–18] days vs 4 [2–11] days, P < .001). These patients required increased renal replacement therapy use (4.1% vs 20.0%, P < .001) and transfusion requirements. Liver failure was more common (4.6% vs 18.2%, P < .001) for intense RM patients. It was associated with bivariate and multivariable analysis with intense RM (odds ratio [OR], 4.51 [1.11–19.2]; P = .034), need for renal replacement therapy, and Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study established the presence of an association between trauma-related RM and classical hepatic biomarkers. Liver failure was associated with the presence of intense RM in bivariate and multivariable analysis. Traumatic RM could have a role in the development of other system failures, specifically at the hepatic level, in addition to the already known and well-described renal failure.

No abstract