Background: Dolutegravir is currently the preferred component of first-line antiretroviral therapy. To facilitate clinical pharmacology studies in key populations, quantitative analytical methods compatible with microsampling and adaptable to resource-limited settings are desirable. The authors developed and validated a liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method to quantify dolutegravir in dried blood spots (DBS).Methods: Calibration standards and quality control samples were prepared by spotting 50 mL of dolutegravir-spiked whole blood on each circle of DBS cards. Three spots (two 6-mm punches/spot) were extracted with methanol. Chromatographic separation was achieved with gradient elution of acetonitrile/potassium phosphate monobasic buffer (pH 5) on a reverse-phase C18 column (flow rate, 1 mL/min) using pioglitazone as the internal standard. UV detection was performed at 260 nm. In the clinical pharmacokinetic study, DBS from finger prick was collected from participants (n = 10) at 8 time points over 12 hours postdosing, with paired plasma at 1 and 12 hours. The method was used to quantify dolutegravir, estimating pharmacokinetic parameters. Agreement between DBS and plasma concentrations was evaluated using linearity and Bland-Altman plots. Results:The method was validated over the concentration range of 0.4-10 mcg/mL, accuracy was 102.4%-114.8%, and precision was 3.4%-14.7%. The mean recovery was 42.3% (%CV: 8.3). The mean (6SD) dolutegravir concentration in DBS was 37.5% (63.8%) lower than that in the plasma. DBS-derived and measured plasma concentrations showed strong correlation with linearity (R 2 = 0.9804) and Bland-Altman plots. Means (%CV) of area under curve, C max , and C 24 from the DBS-derived plasma concentration were 37.8 (23.2) mcg$h/mL, 2.7 (24.7) mcg/mL, and 1.34 (31.6) mcg/mL, respectively. Conclusions:The application of this simple, accurate, and precise method will expand opportunities for clinical assessment of dolutegravir in resource-limited settings.
Background: A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify drugs in dried cervicovaginal secretions from flocked swabs was developed and validated using the antiretroviral efavirenz as an example. Methods: Cervicovaginal swabs (CVS) were prepared by submerging flocked swabs in efavirenz-spiked matrix. Time to full saturation, weight uniformity, recovery and room temperature stability were evaluated. Chromatographic separation was on a reverse-phase C18 column by gradient elution using 1mM ammonium acetate in water/acetonitrile at 400 µL/min. Detection and quantification were on a TSQ Quantum Access triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operated in negative ionisation mode. The method was used to quantify efavirenz in CVS samples from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women in the VADICT study (NCT03284645). A total of 98 samples (35 paired intensive CVS and DBS samples, 14 paired sparse CVS and DBS samples) from 19 participants were available for this analysis. Results: Swabs were fully saturated within 15 seconds, absorbing 128 µL of matrix with coefficient of variation (%CV) below 1.3%. The method was linear with a weighting factor (1/X) in the range of 25-10000 ng/mL with inter- and intra-day precision (% CV) of 7.69-14.9%, and accuracy (% bias) of 99.1-105.3%. Mean recovery of efavirenz from CVS was 83.8% (%CV, 11.2) with no significant matrix effect. Efavirenz remained stable in swabs for at least 35 days after drying and storage at room temperature. Median (range) CVS efavirenz AUC0-24h was 16370 ng*h/mL (5803-22088), Cmax was 1618 ng/mL (610-2438) at a Tmax of 8.0 h (8.0-12), and Cmin was 399 ng/mL (110-981). Efavirenz CVS:plasma AUC0-24 ratio was 0.41 (0.20-0.59). Conclusions: Further application of this method will improve our understanding of the pharmacology of other therapeutics in the female genital tract, including in low- and middle-income countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.